Measurement of damping properties of beeswax and cosmetic wax using Oberst beam method
Nagaraja Jade^{1} , Sachin Bhirodkar^{2} , Venkatesham B^{3}
^{1, 2, 3}Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Hyderabad, Kandi, Telangana, 502285, India
^{3}Corresponding author
Vibroengineering PROCEDIA, Vol. 29, 2019, p. 5459.
https://doi.org/10.21595/vp.2019.21148
Received 31 October 2019; accepted 10 November 2019; published 28 November 2019
Damping treatment is a standard practice in many industries for controlling excessive vibration at resonance. Different damping materials are available for various engineering applications. Wax is one of them, and it’s mostly used in musical instruments. There are two types of wax are available namely beeswax (natural wax) and cosmetic wax. The aim of the present study is to measure damping properties of these two types of wax using Oberst Beam Method (OBM). The effects of damping material’s thickness and bare sample on damping loss factor are studied.
 Measured the damping properties of beeswax (natural wax) and cosmetic wax using Oberst Beam Method (OBM).
 In this study, two bare samples with eight composite beams (bare beam and damping material) are tested with a different thickness of the damping layer at room temperature.
 Study shows that damping properties of beeswax and cosmetic wax increase with increasing bare beam thickness and damping layer thickness.
 Cosmetic wax has a higher loss factor as compared to beeswax.
Keywords: damping material, beeswax, cosmetic wax, Oberst beam method.
1. Introduction
Damping is a phenomenon in which mechanical energy is dissipated as heat in dynamical systems and is used for controlling excessive vibration at resonance. Reduction in the level of vibration amplitude depends on structure and damping material properties. Due to various applications of surface damping treatments in diverse engineering fields, a lot of research work is done on evaluation of damping properties using different techniques. Oberst Beam Method (OBM) is wellknown and recommended by ASTM [1] and SAE^{}[2] standards for evaluation and measurement of material damping properties. Initial work on measurement and calculation of a damping loss factor of composite was done by Oberst and Frankenfeld in 1952 [3]. Later in 1959, D. Ross et al., studied effect of damping on a plate flexural vibration by viscoelastic laminate [4]. Using OBM, Jones [5] studied effect of temperature and frequency on the dynamic properties of damping material and showed that these parameters have a significant role in materials damping measurement.Wojtowicki et al. [6] proposed an alternative approach for measuring the damping properties of materials to avoid the experimental uncertainties and to improve the accuracy of the measurements. Instead of using conventional capacitive sensor, Jung et al. [7] used a Microflown velocity sensor for measuring loss factor, resonance factor and Young’s modulus of structural steel and polycarbonate. They compared measured results with standard OBM and analytically estimated results and proved that results from all the methods are in good agreement.
One of the naturally available damping materials is beeswax, which is produced by honeybees. They are obtained in two grades, one in yellow (natural) and the other is bleached beeswax (cosmetic wax). Both are used in different applications such as food, medical, skin care, musical instruments and cosmetic, etc. Most of research work was focused on characterization of structural properties of honeycomb panels inspired by a natural honeybee hive. However, authors have not come across literature available on damping properties of honeybee wax or cosmetic wax. Current research work is focused majorly on measurement of damping properties of beeswax and cosmetic wax. Also, studied the effect of damping material thickness on loss factor.
Damping properties can be measured either in frequency or time domain methods. In this study, a frequencydomain half bandwidth method is used to measure damping properties. Two bare samples with eight composite beams (bare beam and damping material) are tested with a different thickness of the damping layer at room temperature. Modal frequency of bare samples measured from OBM are corroborated with numerical and analytical results.
2. Theoretical review
This section briefly describes the ASTM standard method (resonant method) for calculating the loss factor, Young’s modulus of both bare and composite beam. These parameters are calculated based on measurement of Frequency Response Functions (FRF) of a cantilever beam.
2.1. Bare beam (Undamped)
Damping loss factor for a uniform beam of length $l$, thickens $H$ with density $\rho $ can be calculated by following expression, as specified in ASTM E75693 standard [1]:
where, ${f}_{n}$ is resonance frequency of mode $n$ and $\mathrm{\Delta}{f}_{n}$ is half power bandwidth. Expression of Young’s modulus for bare beam as specified in ASTM E75693 standard [1] is given by:
where, ${C}_{n}$ is coefficient for mode $n$ of the cantilever beam, $E$ is Young’s modulus of bare beam.
2.2. Beam with damping layer on a single side
In case of the composite beam (damping layer on a single side), expressions for Young’s modulus and loss factor specified in ASTM E75693 standard are based on RossKerwinUngar (RKU) equation [4]:
${\eta}_{1}={\eta}_{c}\left[\frac{\left(1+MT\right)\left(1+4MT\right)+6M{T}^{2}+4M{T}^{3}+{M}^{2}{T}^{4}}{\left(MT\right)\left(3+6T+4{T}^{2}+2M{T}^{3}+{M}^{2}{T}^{4}\right)}\right],$
where, ${E}_{1}$ is Young’s modulus of damping material (MPa), $M={E}_{1}/E$ is Young’s modulus ratio. $H$ is thickness of bare beam (m), ${H}_{1}$ is thickness of damping material (m), $T={H}_{1}/H$, thickness ratio. $\rho $ is density of bare beam (kg/m^{3}), ${\rho}_{1}$ is density of damping material (kg/m^{3}), $D={\rho}_{1}/\rho $ density ratio. $\alpha ={\left({f}_{c}/{f}_{n}\right)}^{2}\left(1+DT\right)$ and $\beta =4+6T+4{T}^{2}$. $\eta $ is loss factor of bare beam, ${\eta}_{1}$_{}is loss factor of damping material, ${\eta}_{c}=\mathrm{\Delta}{f}_{c}/{f}_{c}$, loss factor of composite beam (bare beam and damping material), $\mathrm{\Delta}{f}_{c}$ is half power bandwidth for modes of composite beam (Hz), ${f}_{c}$ is resonance frequency for mode $n$ of composite beam (Hz), ${f}_{n}$ is resonance frequency for mode $n$ of bare beam (Hz). $l$ is length of bare beam (m), $I$ is moment of inertia of bare beam (m^{4}), $A$ is area of bare beam (m^{2}).
3. Measurement setup and procedure
3.1. Test samples details
In the current study, two bare samples of mild steel material with 7900 kg/m^{3 }density with dimensions of 240 mm×20 mm×1.7 mm and 240 mm×20 mm×2 mm (length×width×thickness) are considered. Here, different thicknesses of bare samples are chosen to study effect of bare sample thickness on damping. Fig. 1 shows schematic of bare sample and with damping material as a layer. The root is a sample holding mechanism in Oberst beam method.
Fig. 1. Schematic of test samples: a) bare sample, b) bare sample with damping layer
a)
b)
Natural wax is prepared by crushing honey bee hives (without honey) and then heated until it becomes a soft gel. It is applied to bare samples as a layer and curing is done at room temperature about 14 hours. For cosmetic wax (i.e. bleached wax which is available in the market), it is heated between 5^{}to 10^{o }C of above room temperature in wax heater and then applied to bare sample as a layer. The densities of these wax materials are calculated based on the measurement of weight by a volume ratio at room temperature and corresponding values are reported in Table 1. It also presents the details about test samples and damping materials. In present research, total eight test samples are studied (excluding bare samples) in damping test with a different combination of damping material (beeswax and cosmetic wax) and bare sample thickness. Details regarding these eight test sample’s notation are shown in Table 2.
Table 1. Details of test bare samples and damping materials
Parameters

Details

Parameters

Details

Boundary condition

Clamped  Free

Material tested

Cosmetic wax

Beam length (mm)

240

Beeswax


Beam width (mm)

20

Density of bare beam

7900 kg/m^{3}

Bare thickness (mm)

1.7

Cosmetic wax density

934 kg/m^{3}

2

Beeswax density

873 kg/m^{3}

Table 2. Details of test samples notation in damping test
Test sample

Bare beam thickness ($H$)

Damping material

Damping material thickness (${H}_{1}$)

A

1.7 mm

Cosmetic Wax

1.29 mm

B

1.7 mm

Cosmetic Wax

2.53 mm

C

1.7 mm

Beeswax

1.29 mm

D

1.7 mm

Beeswax

2.53 mm

E

2 mm

Cosmetic Wax

1.29 mm

F

2 mm

Cosmetic Wax

2.53 mm

G

2 mm

Beeswax

1.29 mm

H

2 mm

Beeswax

2.53 mm

Table 3 shows parametric study to understand variation in damping property’s measurement with respect to damping materials, damping material thickness and bare sample thickness.
3.2. Oberst beam method (OBM)
Experimental test setup for Oberst beam is shown in Fig. 2(a). In this method, noncontact type magnetic force transducer (placed at a free end of the beam) and capacitive displacement transducer (placed near the clamped condition) are used. Input excitation to test sample is provided by force transducer, the response is measured by capacitive displacement transducer and is expressed in terms of Frequency Response Function (FRF). To avoid adverse effects of noncontact electromagnetic excitation, appropriate position of force and displacement transducer are obtained from different trial measurements [8]. Necessary precautions are considered as per ASTM [1] standard during measurements. Here, a random signal is used as an input excitation and natural frequencies are measured based on the measured FRF by locating peaks. Damping properties are obtained using halfpower method by locating the 3 dB reduction from peak amplitude of FRF.
Table 3. Different parameters considered for the comparison study
Case

Comparisons

Test samples considered

Common parameters


Damping material

Damping material thickness

Bare beam thickness


I

a

Cosmetic wax v/s Beeswax

A and C

–

1.29 mm

1.7 mm

b

E and G

–

2 mm


c

B and D

–

2.53 mm

1.7 mm


d

F and H

–

2 mm


II

a

Cosmetic wax thickness

A and B

Cosmetic wax

–

1.7 mm

b

E and F

–

2 mm


III

a

Natural wax thickness

C and D

Beeswax

–

1.7 mm

b

G and H

–

2 mm


IV

a

Effect of bare beam thickness

A and E

Cosmetic wax

1.29 mm

–

b

B and F

2.53 mm

–


c

C and G

Beeswax

1.29 mm

–


d

D and H

2.53 mm

–

Repeatability study of ten measurement trials has been conducted on 1.7 mm bare sample to verify consistency in ten measurements and corresponding results are shown in Fig. 2(b). It can be observed that there is good repeatability from all ten measurements.
Fig. 2. a) Experimental setup for Oberst beam method (OBM), b) frequency response functions for different test trials measured using Oberst beam method
a)
b)
4. Results and discussion
4.1. Damping measurement of composite beam
Damping loss factor for composite beam (bare beam + damping material) of all eight samples (A to H) is measured using halfpower bandwidth method. Cosmetic wax and beeswax composite loss factor are shown in Figs. 3(a) and (b), respectively. It can be observed that composite loss factor is increasing with respect to damping material thickness as well as bare beam thickness. This is due to more flexure in damping material. The deflection is more as damping layer is away from the neutral axis.
Fig. 3. Composite loss factor with respect to frequency: a) Cosmetic wax, b) Beeswax
a)
b)
4.2. Cosmetic wax v/s Beeswax
To identify best damping material having higher loss factor out of cosmetic wax and beeswax, for bare beam thickness 1.7 mm samples B, D and for bare beam thickness of 2 mm samples F, H are considered for the study. These test samples consist of equivalent damping material thickness (2.53 mm) and same testing method is used. A comparison of measured cosmetic and beeswax properties are shown in Fig. 4. It is observed that cosmetic wax has higher loss factor compared to beeswax and is shown in Fig. 4(a) and (b).
Fig. 4. Comparison of measured beeswax and cosmetic wax damping loss factor: a) 1.7 mm bare beam thickness, b) 2 mm bare beam thickness
a)
b)
4.3. Effect of damping material thicknesses and effect of bare sample on loss factor
To understand the effect of damping material thickness on loss factor the following samples are considered. Cosmetic wax samples with 1.7 mm bare beam thickness of A (1.29 mm damping material), B (2.53 mm damping material) and 2 mm bare beam thickness of E (1.29 mm damping material), F (2.53 mm damping material). Beeswax samples with 1.7 mm bare beam thickness of C (1.29 mm damping material), D (2.53 mm damping material) and 2 mm bare beam thickness of G (1.29 mm damping material), H (2.53 mm damping material). These sample result plots are shown in Fig. 5. Based on this study, it is observed that loss factor of damping material increases with increasing thickness of cosmetic wax and beeswax as shown in Fig. 5(a) and (b), respectively.
Beeswax samples of D (1.7 mm bare beam) and H (2 mm bare beam) and Cosmetic wax samples of B (1.7 mm bare beam), F (2 mm bare beam) are considered to understand the effect of bare sample thickness on material loss factor and corresponding results are shown in Fig. 5(a, b). For both the damping materials, damping thickness of 2.53 mm is considered. It can be observed from Fig. 5 that if thickness of bare sample increases then loss factor of damping material also increases without changing damping material thickness. The flexure deflection of damping layer increases as outer layer distance also increases from neutral axis for thicker bare beams.
Fig. 5. Effect on loss factor due to thickness of damping material: a) cosmetic wax, b) beeswax
a)
b)
5. Conclusions
In the present study, measurement of damping properties of beeswax (natural wax) and cosmetic wax has been discussed. A repeatability study was done for measuring natural frequencies, and loss factor of the bare beam. An extensive parametric study was conducted. The present study shows that damping properties of beeswax (natural wax) and cosmetic wax increase with increasing bare beam thickness and damping layer thickness. Additionally, out of beeswax and cosmetic wax, cosmetic wax has a higher loss factor as compared to beeswax.
References
 ASTM Designation: E 75693. Standard Test Method for Measuring Vibration Damping Properties of Materials. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 4, Issue 6, 1993, p. 827833. [Search CrossRef]
 Laboratory Measurement of the Composite Vibration Damping Properties of Materials on a Supporting Steel Bar. Technical Report J1637 SAE, Troy Mich, USA, 2007. [Search CrossRef]
 Oberst H., Frankenfeld K. Damping of the bending vibrations of thin laminated metal beams connected through adherent layer. Acustica, Vol. 2, 1952, p. 181194. [Search CrossRef]
 Ross D., Ungar E. E., Kerwin E. M. Damping of plate flexural vibrations by means of viscoelastic laminate. Proceedings of ASME Structural Damping, New York, 1959, p. 4987. [Search CrossRef]
 Jones D. I. G. Temperaturefrequency dependence of dynamic properties of damping materials. Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 33, Issue 4, 1974, p. 451470. [Publisher]
 Wojtowicki J. L., Jaouen L., Panneton R. New approach for the measurement of the damping properties of materials using the Oberst beam. Review of Scientific Instruments, Vol. 75, Issue 8, 2004, p. 25692574. [Publisher]
 Jung S. S., Kim Y. T., Lee Y. B., Shin S. H., Kim D., Kim H. C. Measurement of the resonance frequency, the loss factor, and the dynamic Young’s modulus in structural steel and polycarbonate by using an acoustic velocity sensor. Journal of the Korean Physical Society, Vol. 49, Issue 5, 2006, p. 19611966. [Search CrossRef]
 Koruk H., Sanliturk K. Y. Identification and removal of adverse effects of noncontact electromagnetic excitation in Oberst beam test method. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 30, 2012, p. 274295. [Publisher]
 Rao S. S., Yap F. F. Mechanical Vibrations. Fourth Edition. AddisonWesley, New York, 1995. [Search CrossRef]
 Nashif A. D., Henderson J. P. Vibration Damping. John Wiley & Sons, 1985. [Search CrossRef]