^{1}School of Automotive Mechatronics, Jiangxi Environmental Engineering Vocational College, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
Vibroengineering PROCEDIA, Vol. 36, 2021, p. 2429.
https://doi.org/10.21595/vp.2020.21802
Received 5 November 2020; received in revised form 17 November 2020; accepted 25 November 2020; published 25 March 2021
In connection with the complex operating conditions of gearbox, multiple vibration excitation sources, and difficulty in extracting vibration signal fault features, a novel method of gearbox fault diagnosis is proposed. based on the fusion of EEMD and improved Elman neural network (ElmanNN) is developed. The wavelet packet is utilized to denoise the collected vibration signals of four different types of gearboxes: broken teeth, cracks, wear, and normal, and then use the EEMD method to decompose the denoised vibration signals, and use the correlation coefficient criterion means to carry out the IMF pseudo component elimination, and then get a more effective signal. Calculate the energy feature of the effective signal and use it as the enter feature of the ElmanNN. Based on standard ElmanNN, a selffeedback factor $\beta $ is added to construct a reformed ElmanNN. Experimental results indicate that compared with the standardized ElmanNN, the improved ElmanNN has higher diagnostic accuracy and diagnostic efficiency.
 A novel method of gearbox fault diagnosis is proposed based on the fusion of EEMD and improved Elman neural network (ElmanNN) is developed.
 Based on standard ElmanNN, a selffeedback factor β is added to construct a improved ElmanNN.
 Experimental results indicate that compared with the traditional ElmanNN, the improved ElmanNN has higher diagnostic accuracy and diagnostic efficiency.
Keywords: gearbox fault, the EEMD method, IMF component screening, improved ElmanNN.
1. Introduction
As the core component of mechanical transmission system, gearbox is widely used in various mechanical equipment [1]. Because the working environment of the gearbox is usually more complicated, longterm operation, coupled with the influence of various factors such as temperature and lubrication, the gears of gearbox are prone to pitting, broken teeth, and wear failures, and the gearbox bearings are prone to failures such as wear and bending. If the abnormality cannot be detected in time, longterm operation will cause damage or abnormal accumulation gradually, causing irreversible consequences. Therefore, it is necessary to monitor the status of the gearbox in real time, accurately determine the type and location of the fault, and maintain it in time to achieve the goal of minimizing the expected loss.
The empirical mode decomposition (EMD) method is a new timefrequency analysis method proposed by Huang, and it is an adaptive timefrequency localization analysis method [2]. EMD is superior to the Fourier transform method, yet the more important disadvantage of EMD is modal aliasing. In order to solve this problem better, Huang also proposed an improved EMD method, namely EEMD (Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition) method [3]. Because the gear fault signal is nonlinear and nonstationary, and the ElmanNN has strong nonlinear mapping and fault tolerance, it is especially suitable for nonlinear pattern recognition and classification, so it is introduced into fault diagnosis. Ayodeji [4] introduced an ElmanNN to perform nuclear power plant fault diagnosis, and the results show that the diagnosis method is feasible. Chemseddine [5] proposed a novel fault diagnosis method for gearbox system based on the fusion of HEWTSVD and ElmanNN. The results show that the diagnostic performance of this method is better than (HHT)SVD, (LMD)SVD and (WPT)PCA methods. Baraldi [6] developed a fault diagnosis method based on AutoAssociative Kernel Regression, Fuzzy Similarity and Elman Recurrent NN. This combined method can overcome the limitations of these three independent methods. Considering that the standard ElmanNN can only identify the firstorder dynamic model, as the hidden layer or the order of the system increases, its dynamic memory and association capabilities are significantly weaker. Based on the advantages of the EEMD method and the shortcomings of the standard ElmanNN, this paper puts forward a gearbox fault diagnosis means based on the fusion of EEMD and the improved ElmanNN.
2. Extraction of effective IMF components based on EEMD method
EEMD is an improved algorithm of EMD, which can overcome the modal aliasing phenomenon caused by nonwhite noise interference generated by EMD algorithm [3]. After the initial signal is decomposed by EEMD, due to multiple factors such as decomposition error and interpolation error, the IMF component in the decomposition result is prone to false components. If the false component exists in the feature domain, it will obviously cause a large error in the extracted degradation performance index. Therefore, it is very necessary to remove the false component. Considering that the correlation between the false component and the initial signal is small, the false component can be distinguished by introducing a correlation coefficient. We can make the mathematical expression of the correlation coefficient be described as follows:
where ${\lambda}_{j}$ ($j=$1, ..., $l$) are the correlation coefficients between all IMF components and the original signals; $x$ and $\stackrel{}{x}$ represent respectively the initial signal and its average value; $y$ and $\stackrel{}{y}$ represent respectively the IMF component signal and its average value; $n$ represents the number of acquisition data samples of vibration signal.
Then, set the threshold value $\mu $ for distinguishing false components. If the correlation coefficient between the IMF component and the initial signal is less than the $\mu $, it will be removed. Finally, the IMF components larger than the $\mu $ will be retained and reconstructed, so as to obtain an effective initial signal to achieve a reduction of noise.
3. The improved algorithm of ElmanNN
ElmanNN is a feedback neural network (NN), a typical localized regression network, a forward NN which is provided with localized memory units and localized feedback connections. The standardized ElmanNN uses the BP algorithm, which can only identify firstorder dynamic models. When the hidden layer or the order of the system increases, its dynamic memory and association capabilities are limited. To this end, this paper uses a reformed ElmanNN to analyze and diagnose multiple failure modes of asynchronous motor rolling bearings. The improved ElmanNN adds a selffeedback factor $\beta $ ($\beta \in $[0, 1]) on the basis of the standard network. That is, mutual feedback and selffeedback are introduced between nodes in the same layer of feedforward network, which makes this network better achieve the recognition of nonlinear mapping pattern, while the selffeedback link of correlated nodes also largely streamlines the network scale and improves the learning speed. The structure of improved ElmanNN structure is shown in Fig. 1. When $\beta $ is close to 1, it indicates that it can contain more distant info. When $\beta $ is equal to 0, this reformed ElmanNN degenerates into a standardized ElmanNN.
Suppose that $X$ which is the input vector of the whole network is $r$dimensional, $Y$ which is the output vector is $m$dimensional, ${Y}_{J}$ which is the output vector of the hidden layer and ${Y}_{L}$ which is the output vector of the successor layer are $s$dimensional. The mathematical model which belongs to the improved ElmanNN [7] is described as follows:
Eq. (4) is used to obtain partial derivatives of ${w}_{oj}$, ${w}_{ji}$, and ${w}_{jl}$ and set them to 0. Finally, the learning algorithm which belongs to the reformed ElmanNN is obtained:
where ${w}_{oj}$, ${w}_{ji}$, and ${w}_{jl}$ respectively denote the $j$th node in the hiddenlayer to the $o$th node in the outputlayer, the $i$th node in the inputlayer to the $j$th node in the hiddenlayer, and the $l$th node in the inheriting layer to the $j$th node in the hiddenlayer. While $g(\u2022)$ and $f(\u2022)$ respectively represent activation functions of the outputlayer neurons and the hiddenlayer neurons. $out\left(\right)$ represents the output of inputlayer; $net\left(\right)$ represents the net input of a certain layer; $I$ represents the inputlayer; $J$ represents the hiddenlayer; $L$ represents the receiving layer; $O$ represents the outputlayer; $y\left(k\right)$ represents the real output of network; ${y}_{d}\left(k\right)$ is the expected output; $E$ represents the error objective function; $k$ is the iteration order. ${\eta}_{1}$, ${\eta}_{2}$, and ${\eta}_{3}$ respectively represent the learning steps of ${w}_{jl}$, ${w}_{ji}$, and ${w}_{oj}$, ${\delta}_{i}$ and ${\delta}_{j}$ are respectively denoted as the deviation values of the $i$th node in outputlayer and the $j$th node in hiddenlayer.
Fig. 1. The improved structure of ElmanNN
4. Experiment analysis
4.1. The collection of experiment data
The experiment device is shown in Fig. 2(a). The included hardware mainly includes the QPZZII fault diagnosis test platform system, several acceleration sensors, two data collectors, and one signal conditioner. The small gear of this experiment platform is the driving wheel, which the motor shaft is connected to; the big gear is the driven wheel, which the magnetic powder brake is connected to through a coupling. Paste a circle of black tape on the driving shaft (leaving a slit of about 2 mm to reflect light), and use an infrared speedometer to measure the shaft speed. The number of teeth of the pinion is 55; the number of teeth of the big gear is 75. And two acceleration sensors are respectively installed in vertical and horizontal directions of the big gear outside the gearbox. The calibration values of these two sensors are respectively 99 mV/g and 102 mV/g. The layout of measuring point is shown in Fig. 2(b).
A dualchannel data collector is used to collect normal signals and three typical fault signals of cracks, broken teeth and wear. To ensure that enough data samples are collected, the sampling frequency must be 2.56 or more times of the analysis frequency.
Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of experimental acquisition device
a) Schematic diagram of experimental platform
b) Schematic diagram of measuring point layout
4.2. Signal denoising and effective signal screening
The wavelet packet method is utilized to denoise the normal signal and the three typical fault signals of cracks, broken teeth, and wear. Then use EEMD to decompose the signals, and set the Nstd in the EEMD algorithm to 0.2, and add 1000 times of Gaussian white noise, then we get 1 margin and 10 IMF components, as shown in Fig. 3. Finally, use the correlation coefficient criterion shown in Eq. (1) to screen the effective IMF components. In the screening, set the correlation coefficient threshold $\mu =$0.15, and the correlation coefficients of IMF1, IMF2, and RES are all less than 0.15, so they are eliminated. The remaining components are reconstructed to obtain the effective signal after screening.
Fig. 3. IMF components of the fault signal of a cracked gear
4.3. The extraction of energy feature
When the system is excited, the generated vibration signal will modulate the amplitude or frequency of some components, causing the energy of the signal to change. Therefore, the energy change of each component reflects the fault condition of the gear, and the energy of every component is normalized as the input of the network. The data samples of the normalized vector of energy failure characteristics of different gear failure types are shown in Table 1. Due to space reasons, only 5 sets of training sample data for different failure types are given. In the actual analysis, the sample data used is 100 sets, each set of data includes 4 energy characteristic values of different frequency bands.
Table 1. Sample data of energy characteristics of different fault types (only 5 groups listed)
Fault
types

Serial number

The feature vectors of fault signal

Fault
types

Serial number

The feature vectors of fault signal


E1

E2

E3

E4

E1

E2

E3

E4


Broken tooth signal

1

0.5049

0.2352

0.2350

0.025

Wear signal

1

0.2920

0.4547

0.1690

0.0843

2

0.5477

0.1972

0.2416

0.0134

2

0.2356

0.4945

0.1781

0.0917


3

0.5849

0.2222

0.1765

0.0163

3

0.2675

0.4550

0.2119

0.0656


4

0.3691

0.3503

0.2661

0.0146

4

0.2520

0.4875

0.1670

0.0935


5

0.6534

0.1560

0.1809

0.0096

5

0.2523

0.4394

0.1824

0.1260


Crack signal

1

0.8225

0.1595

0.0155

0.0025

Normal signal

1

0.2304

0.3153

0.2038

0.2504

2

0.8104

0.1636

0.0237

0.0023

2

0.3818

0.2736

0.2095

0.1350


3

0.8444

0.1363

0.0172

0.0021

3

0.0972

0.3067

0.3075

0.2886


4

0.8143

0.1600

0.022

0.0037

4

0.0984

0.3961

0.2656

0.2399


5

0.8354

0.1409

0.0211

0.0026

5

0.0841

0.3380

0.3439

0.2340

4.4. The analysis of diagnosis result
There are 4 types of gearbox faults studied in this paper: broken gear tooth fault (1, 0, 0, 0), crack fault (0, 1, 0, 0), wear fault (0, 0, 1, 0), no fault (0, 0, 0, 1). In order to facilitate comparison, the structural parameters of the ElmanNN before and after the improvement are basically the same. The selection is as follows: the number of input neurons is 4 (energy characteristics of 4 frequency bands), and the output neurons are 4 (4 failure types). The transfer functions belonging to hidden layer and output layer are respectively set as tansig and logsig functions, the number of training is set to 1000, the index minimum mean square error is set to 10^{10}, and $\beta =$0.38. Fig. 4 and Fig. 5 are the training conditions of ElmanNN before and after improvement. The standard ElmanNN needs to be trained for 83 steps to achieve the set average square error, the diagnosis time is 0.4038 seconds, and the diagnosis error is 1.0e07×[0.0038, 0.0025, 0.5413, 0.0040]. The informed ElmanNN just needs to train 32 steps to achieve the set average square error, the diagnosis time is 0.3204 seconds, and the diagnosis error is 1.0e07×[0.0002, 0.0517, 0.1469, 0.0039]. From the result, it is not difficult to see that the improved ElmanNN can effectively diagnose different types of gear faults, but the improved ElmanNN has shorter diagnosis time and higher diagnosis accuracy.
Fig. 4. Output result of standard ElmanNN
a) Number of iterations
b) Training process
Fig. 5. Improved ElmanNN
5. Conclusions
In this work, in order to more efficiently and accurately identify broken teeth, cracks, wear and normal gear conditions involved in the gearbox, a fault diagnosis method based on the fusion of EEMD and improved ElmanNN is introduced. Through the EEMD decomposition of gear vibration signals of different types of failures, the correlation coefficient criterion method is utilized to implement effective IMF component screening, to obtain more pure vibration information. In order to build the ElmanNN with faster learning speed, I add a feedback factor to the standardized ElmanNN to make the network realize the pattern recognition of nonlinear mapping better. And to a large extent, the selffeedback connection of the correlated nodes simplifies the scale of the network. Therefore, the learning speed of the network is improved. The analysis results of experiment indicate the improved ElmanNN diagnosis system has the characteristics of higher accuracy and shorter diagnosis time.
References
 Ye Z., Yu J. Gearbox fault diagnosis based on feature learning of multichannel onedimensional convolutional neural network. Vibration and Shock, Vol. 39, Issue 20, 2020, p. 5566, (in Chinese). [Search CrossRef]
 Liu X., Zhang X., Luan Z., et al. Rolling bearing fault diagnosis based on EEMD sample entropy and PNN. Journal of EngineeringJoe, Vol. 23, 2019, p. 86968700. [Search CrossRef]
 Jiang T., Hua Q. Option pricing for TGARCHM with GED based on improved EEMD. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Vol. 55, Issue 13, 2019, p. 29292948. [Publisher]
 Ayodeji A., Lin Y., Xia H. Knowledge base operator support system for nuclear power plant fault diagnosis. Progress in Nuclear Energy, Vol. 105, 2018, p. 4250. [Publisher]
 Chemseddine R., Boualem M., Djamel B., et al. Gear fault feature extraction and classification of singular value decomposition based on Hilbert empirical wavelet transform. Journal of Vibroengineering, Vol. 20, Issue 4, 2018, p. 16031618. [Publisher]
 Baraldi P., Di Maio, F., Genini D., et al. Comparison of datadriven reconstruction methods for fault detection. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Vol. 64, Issue 3, 2015, p. 852860. [Publisher]
 Huang L., Xiao S., Song M. Fault diagnosis of asynchronous motor rolling bearing based on synergetic wavelet packet and ElmanNN. Modern Manufacturing Engineering, Vol. 7, 2014, p. 1071031. [Search CrossRef]