^{1}Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Applied Sciences Zittau/Görlitz, Zittau, Germany
Vibroengineering PROCEDIA, Vol. 19, 2018, p. 1721.
https://doi.org/10.21595/vp.2018.20185
Received 30 August 2018; accepted 6 September 2018; published 24 September 2018
33rd International Conference on Vibroengineering in Zittau, Germany, September 2426th, 2018
Linear vibratory conveyors are common equipment to convey goods. They are used in different industries such as for example the building, mining and food industry. The systems are often used for the supply of bulk goods into further processing operations. The goods to be conveyed, typically requesting a heavyduty design of the conveyor and eccentric excitation drives with relatively high torque. Often the motion of these conveyors is not ideal with reference to the conveying process of the bulk goods. Motion speed and amplitude of the goods are not constant and blocking effects as well as separation effects can occur. The target of this article is to determine a dynamic model for the targeted displacement of the centre of elasticity of a onemass conveyor, enabling an optimal motion of the conveyor by an optimized set of springs, connecting the conveying element to the frame.
Keywords: vibratory conveyor, spring stiffness, resonance frequencies, dynamic model, centre of elasticity.
1. Introduction
Linear vibratory conveyors are mainly built to forward bulk material for the mining, building and food industry, such as rock, grit and flour. The assembly of these vibratory conveyors consists of two principal parts, the conveying element build as a conveying trough and a supporting element, build of steel elements and fixed to the ground by heavyduty screws [1, 2]. Often, the conveying element is linked to the frame just be a set of springs. Such a system represents an efficient method for the generation of a microthrow motion to the goods to be conveyed. Often, conveyors of this type are not intended to generate a constant motion regarding conveying speed and amplitude over the full length of the conveying element. This is mainly caused by the situation of the mass centre point and the centre of elasticity of such a conveyor. To eliminate this disadvantage, some linear vibratory conveyors are additionally equipped with a set of guiding levers between conveying element and Frame. Fig. 1 shows a typical onemass vibratory conveyor without any guiding mechanism.
Fig. 1. Onemass vibratory conveyor without guiding levers [own source]
2. Applied methods
The theoretical solution is done in two steps. At first, a dynamic model is designed and then the dynamic parameters are determined.
2.1. Determination of the conveyors dynamic model
Onemass linear vibratory conveyors corresponding to the shown variant consisting of a conveying element which is connected to the base frame by four helical springs. Two eccentric drives are connected directly to the conveying element under a certain angle to the horizontal line. The eccentric dives turning clockwise (left drive in direction of material flow) and anticlockwise (right drive in direction of material flow). These drives are selfcentring and so a motion across the main forwarding direction is eliminated [3, 4].
Corresponding to the conveyor as shown in Fig. 1, the following general mechanical model can be of this conveyor type can be generated [5]:
Fig. 2. Mechanical model of the vibratory conveyor [own source]
2.2. Calculation of dynamic parameters
Assuming ${\xi}_{A}={\xi}_{B}$, Eq. (1) can be converted to:
Based on this assumption, the following equations can be set up:
$={F}_{0}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{s}\beta F\bullet \rho PF\mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\beta PF+{F}_{0}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\beta F\bullet \rho PF\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{s}\beta PF.$
Converted into the matrix form, the following matrices can be built.
For the mass:
For the stiffness of the springs:
The mechanical model described in Fig. 2, enables three degrees of freedom, i.e. a longitudinal motion in $x$direction, a second longitudinal motion in $z$direction and a rotation around the mass centre point, depending on the situation and effective direction of the excitation force and the centre of elasticity of the system. To ensure a pure linear motion under the intended excitation angle, it is necessary to avoid any kind of rotation around the mass centre point on this type of linear vibratory conveyor. As soon as a rotation takes place, the motion of the conveyed goods will be influenced in an unintended way, causing a suboptimal motion of the goods and a potential malfunction of the conveyor [6].
A mayor influence in this model comes from the damping conditions. Neglecting the horizontal components of the general model, the following equations can be formed for the values in $z$direction.
For the displacement:
For the velocity:
and for the acceleration:
The velocity which is linked to the damping in the dynamic calculation of the system, represents the first derivation of the displacement and is the only component including a cosine function. For systems with very low damping, as given on a linear vibratory conveyor of the variant $A$, the following equations then can be formed:
By the use of a numerical model, based on the Eqs. (11) to (13), a graph can be designed, showing the area of norotation. A valley between the stiffness ${k}_{AZ}$ and ${k}_{BZ}$ occurs and the intended amplitudes of the system can be selected by following the particular lines through the valley.
The following graph Fig. 4 for amplitude over stiffness in $z$direction will be received.
Transmitting the requested design conditions for pure linear motion into the general model shown in Fig. 2, a conveyor with pure linear motion and no rotation around its mass centre point can be designed.
3. Results and discussions
To verify and validate the possibilities of modification on linear vibratory conveyors build on the mechanical model shown in Fig. 2, an existing conveyor is analysed and modified by changing the springs of the system. The stiffness of the springs is calculated based on the general Eqs. (3)(5).
Fig. 3. Amplitude over stiffness 3D graph of a linear vibratory conveyor
Fig. 4. Rotation component of the amplitude in point A of the conveyor
In addition, the damping of the system has to be considered on the real conveyor. This is done by extending the equations by the terms corresponding to the damping of the system as follows:
$+\left[\left({b}_{Ax}{b}_{Bx}\right){\xi}_{A}+\left({b}_{Ax}{b}_{Bx}\right){\xi}_{B}\right]\bullet \dot{\phi}={F}_{0}\bullet \mathrm{cos}\left(\omega Ft\right),$
$+\left[\left({b}_{Az}{b}_{Bz}\right){\xi}_{A}+\left({b}_{Az}{b}_{Bz}\right){\xi}_{B}\right]\bullet \dot{\phi}={F}_{0}\bullet \mathrm{sin}\left(\omega Ft\right),$
$+\left[\left({k}_{Az}{k}_{Bz}\right){\xi}_{A}^{2}+\left({k}_{Az}{k}_{Bz}\right){\xi}_{B}^{2}\right]\bullet \phi +\left[\left({b}_{Az}+{b}_{Bz}\right){\xi}_{A}^{2}+\left({b}_{Az}+{b}_{Bz}\right){\xi}_{B}^{2}\right]$
$={F}_{0}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{s}\beta F\bullet \rho PF\mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\beta PF++{F}_{0}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\beta F\bullet \rho PF\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{s}\beta PF.$
Finally, all equations are converted into matrix form. For the mass matrix and the damping matrix, the equations will stay identical to Eqs. (6) and (7). For the damping, the following matrix has to be created:
3.1. Result of the analysis of the existing system
Following the graph in Fig. 4, ${k}_{Bx}$ is situated in the area of no rotation while the amplitude for ${k}_{Ax}$ corresponds to an amplitude of approximately 1.00 mm. That means, the rotating component of the motion in point A has an additional effect of 0.90 mm compared to point B.
Calculation and graph confirming the experience made during testing the system. So, the equations are verified as useful tool for the general analysis of linear vibratory conveyors of the analysed design. In a further step, the calculation model will be used for the determination of spring pairs, elimination the rotation component of the conveyor.
3.2. Calculation of the optimized conditions
To keep the compact and rigid design of the linear vibratory conveyor, the best possible solution to modify the conveyors motion would be a relocation of the centre of elasticity.
Keeping the mass conditions of the conveying element untouched and ensuring the damping conditions staying competitive to the presently existing once, a solution will be found by changing the stiffness conditions of the springs in the points A and B of the conveyor.
Focused on this modification possibility, three options of influencing the situation of the mass centre point with a simultaneous elimination of the rotation part of the motion are generally possible:
• Changing the stiffness ${k}_{Az}$ by replacing the springs in point A,
• Changing the stiffness ${k}_{Bz}$ by replacing the springs in point B,
• Changing the stiffness ${k}_{Az}$ and the stiffness ${k}_{Bz}$ by replacing all springs in points A and B.
Based on this numerical calculation, a test series for the determination of the new situation of the centre of elasticity and the operation conditions is realised and the described modification possibilities are verified.
Fig. 5. Corresponding stiffness ${k}_{Az}$ and ${k}_{Bz}$ for the selection of test springsdifferent possibilities
a)
b)
4. Conclusions
In this paper, a dynamic model of a onemass linear vibratory conveyor, conducted with the calculation of kinematic parameters for the model is determined. The result of the elaboration is a mechanical model, which can be used as base for the modification of the conveyors motion by situating the centre of elasticity optimal.
General equations for the model are developed and the final numerical system to calculate specific stiffness of springs for the targeted situation of the centre of elasticity of linear vibratory conveyors is introduced.
Based on the results of the paper, optimized parameters for the design of onemass linear vibratory conveyors can be defined and simulated.
References
 Harris C. M. Shock and Vibration Handbook. 5th edition, McGrawHill, New York, 2005. [Search CrossRef]
 Buja H. O. Praxishandbuch Ramm und Vibrationstechnik. Bauwerk Verlag Berlin, 2007. [Search CrossRef]
 Dresig H., Holzweißig F. Maschinendynamik 8. Auflage, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2008. [Search CrossRef]
 Knaebel M., Jäger H., Roland Mastel Technische Schwingungslehre. 7. Auflage, Vieweg+Teubner Verlag, Wiesbaden, 2009. [Publisher]
 Pešík M. Function and Performance Optimization of Vibration Conveyors. Ph.D. Thesis, Liberec, 2013. [Search CrossRef]
 Griemert R., Römisch P. Fördertechnik. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2015. [Publisher]
Cited By
Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering
Vitaliy Korendiy, Oleksandr Kachur, Petro Dmyterko

2022

Vibroengineering PROCEDIA
Vitaliy Korendiy, Oleksandr Kachur, Ihor Hurey, Rostyslav Predko, Roman Palash, Oleksandr Havrylchenko

2022
