Sucker rod pump frequencyelastic drive mode development – from the numerical model to the field test
Clemens Langbauer^{1} , Thomas Langbauer^{2} , Rudolf Fruhwirth^{3} , B. Mastobaev^{4}
^{1, 3}Chair of Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Recovery, Montanuniversität Leoben, Leoben, Austria
^{2}TLb Engineering e.U., Graz, Austria
^{4}Ufa State Petroleum Technological University, Chair of Oil and Gas Transportation and Storage, Ufa, Russia
^{1}Corresponding author
Liquid and Gaseous Energy Resources, Vol. 1, Issue 1, 2021, p. 6485.
https://doi.org/10.21595/lger.2021.22074
Received 13 May 2021; received in revised form 27 May 2021; accepted 13 June 2021; published 21 June 2021
A frequencyelastic drive mode for a sucker rod pumping system is introduced to reduce its polished rod peak loads and the total energy consumption. Numerical modeling and an extensive field test verify the concept. The frequencyelastic drive mode is a software solution for variable speed drive systems, which can be applied in the controller and does not require any hardware adjustments. The novel drive mode adjusts the set frequency, sent by the controller to the frequency converter, depending on the actual power requirements. An increase in power consumption results in a reduction of the set frequency, which is proportional to the power consumption increase. A reduction in power consumption results in the opposite effect to achieve a similar pumping speed as for regular operation. The frequencyelastic drive mode is simulated by a numerical model, which covers the entire pumping system. An extensive field test was performed to verify the concept and the numerical model. The simulation and the field test have confirmed the concept of the frequencyelastic drive mode and quantified its saving potential. The evaluation of the field test has shown that the energysaving potential can reach five percent. In addition, a peak polished rod load reduction of up to three percent was seen. At the tested pumping system the frequency elastic drive mode under optimized parameters yields the best results in terms of total energy savings in the pumping speed range between 7 to 10 strokes per minute. A downhole system efficiency increase was seen for any pumping speed. The numerical model matches the field test data and allows the performance prediction of the novel drive mode for changed parameters and wellbore configurations without extensive field testing. The novelty of the presented paper is the concept of the frequencyelastic drive mode, which is a pure software solution for variable speed drive sucker rod pumping systems. The holistic model includes the entire pumping system and matches the field test data at remarkable accuracy.
 The research has shown that software adjustments at the drive controller enable an improvement in the energy efficiency of the sucker rod pumping system.
 By manipulation of the set frequency of the frequency converter with a time constant and a proportional constant, an optimized pumping system motion is achieved.
 For the system, tested in the field, a significant energy consumption reduction of up to 5 percent and a polished rod load reduction of 3 percent was achieved.
 The model is a convenient way to perform a parameter study and further investigate the effects of the frequencyelastic drive mode for other well configurations before applying the novel frequencyelastic drive mode in the field on other wells.
Keywords: sucker rod pump, frequencyelastic drive mode, energy saving drive system optimization.
1. Introduction
The artificial lift market will experience substantial growth in the forthcoming decade, where sucker rod pumps will take a significant share [1]. Sucker rod pumping systems represent the oldest and most widely used artificial lift method with several hundreds of thousands of units worldwide [2]. Their application ranges from lifting oil in mature conventional oil fields, production in stripper wells and unconventional oil fields, to unloading gas wells. Stripper wells represent a high percentage of vertical oil wells and produce less than 10 barrels per day. Sucker rod pumps (SRP) are well known for their flexibility to match the well capacity during the natural decline in production; they can be used to maximize the drawdown in the well, have high efficiency, and a relatively simple design. The system can lift hightemperature and viscous oils. Scale and corrosion treatments can be performed efficiently during the operation [3].
The sucker rod pumping system is composed of the surface unit, the sucker rod string, and the downhole pump. The surface unit, called the pump jack, represents the drive of the system. Fig. 1 presents the schematics of the conventional pump jack design.
Fig. 1. Sucker rod pumping system
The first section of the pump jack reduces the rotation speed, whereas the second transforms the rotation into translation. The electrical motor’s sheave drives the Vbelt, which drives the gear reducer sheave and represents the first stage of speed reduction. The gear reducer sheave is positioned at the twostage gear reducer input shaft, which further reduces the rotation speed. At the output gearbox shaft, the final speed is obtained. This transmission system typically reduces a motor speed of 1,000 rpm by a factor of about 150 to 200. Finally, a system speed in the range between 3 and 15 rpm is reached. The cranks carry the counterweight, which balances the rod string's weight and is connected with the pitman. The pitman is connected to one end of the walking beam. On the other end of the walking beam, the horsehead is positioned. The horsehead’s wireline hangers carry the polished rod, which passes through the wellhead’s stuffing box. The polished rod is connected to the sucker rod string, which transmits the pump jack’s motion to the downhole pump plunger.
During the upstroke of the downhole pump’s plunger, the traveling valve as part of the plunger is closed, the fluid load is carried by the rod string and lifted. Simultaneously, the standing valve is opened to allow inflow into the pump’s intake chamber as part of the fixed barrel. During the plunger’s downstroke, the standing valve, which carries the fluid load now, is closed, and the plunger moves through the fluid column back to its bottom dead center. The cyclic load changes cause dynamics in the pumping system, which need to be handled by the pump jack [4]. Continuous research on the optimization and improvement of surface and downhole components [5], [6], [7] of the pumping system is performed in the laboratory [8], [9] and the field.
The electric motor can be driven directly from the electric grid or by a frequency converter. The electric grid's direct connection is a cheap solution but requires additional hardware, a socalled soft start, and a change in the belt pulley sizes to adjust the pump’s strokes per minute. Using frequency converters (FC) for industrial pump applications is stateoftheart and provides many advantages, like controlling the speed of rotation and torque of the equipment and reducing the grid load at startups through limiting the inrush current. Many publications deal with FC and electric motor combinations for specific applications, increasing efficiency or power density, enhancing control strategies, or extending the power capacity [10]. A sucker rod pumping system driven by a frequency converter is known as a variable speed drive system (VSD). Conventional VSD applications change the motor speed independent of the supply grid frequency. A high degree of flexibility is achieved to adjust the pump speed to the reservoir’s performance. Nevertheless, after a smooth startup, typically, a constant motor frequency is chosen. More recent FC generations enable bidirectional power flow, which refers to a socalled active frontend. Otherwise, the regenerative energy of the system would be burned at the DClink brake resistor, resulting in an efficiency reduction. One major drawback of the VSD technology is the higher acquisition costs. It is also common for higher power ratings that several FC share one input stage and DClink. The energy can then be balanced between the connected electric motors.
Studies of SRP electric drives have shown a low motor efficiency for regular and conventional VSD systems. The reason is seen in the load oscillations of polished rod and counterweights. These load fluctuations change the power factor's characteristics, which vary within a wide range and drop the performance. Accurate counterbalancing is recommended to improve motor efficiency [11]. In the past, low efficient ultrahigh slip motors have been used at the expense of efficiency to improve the system's elasticity and reduce peak loads and power requirements. Khakimyanov and Khusainov [12] showed how to utilize counterbalancing weight to increase efficiency and reduce oil production costs. Solodkiy et al. [13] discussed a sensorless method of a pumping unit and optimal counterbalancing methods within the control algorithm for nonlinear pumping loads. The capabilities of a FC are far beyond enabling just variable motor frequency. Several publications have presented different approaches to change the motor speed within one cycle to improve the SRP system.
Pumping units' variablespeed drive technology is seen as one of the most advanced energysaving technologies applied in oilfields. FCs overcome the pump jack’s limitation of the fourbar mechanism to achieve a fullcycle variable speedcontrolled operation. Ferrigno et al. [14] studied the downhole plunger speed in high gasoil ratio and high friction wells. The plunger speed calculation, based on the viscous damped wave equation algorithms, enabled a comparison with other external tools that consider Coulomb friction and its effects in deviated wells. The operation mode of the frequency converter was adjusted to prevent regeneration by accelerating the motor. Successes have been seen in a field test with 50 pumping systems. A flexible variable frequency driving system was designed for reducing energy consumption in a low rate oil field in China to control pumping speed in realtime [15]. With SPM below one stroke per minute, the superslow systems' optimization has shown a system efficiency improvement from 11.8 % to 18.02 %. The automated and closedloop control algorithm reduced the operator’s demand to monitor the daytoday production. A model, accounting for the system dynamics and the beam pumping unit under variable speed driving conditions, has been shown by Chaodong et al. [16]. Their optimization criterion is the reduction of power consumption. The model’s application on ten wells has shown a significant power saving rate, gear reducer peak torque reduction, and a system efficiency increase. However, ZiMing et al. [17] concluded that fully coupled dynamic models, accounting for the motor, pump jack, rod string, and downhole pump, still need more investigations. Several issues that might be caused by the entire variable speed operation, like the energysaving mechanism, the influence of inertial load caused by moving parts, and counterbalance adjustment, still need to be investigated. Palka and Czyz [18] have demonstrated that the sucker rod pump efficiency can be improved significantly by implementing a defined variable speed of the prime mover. Based on a Fourier series representation of the motor speed, a search algorithm was defined to look for the Fourier coefficients, which maximize production while satisfying the system constraints, like motor torque and speed, stresses in the rod, and energy consumption to determine the optimum motorspeed profile. Field tests showed an increase in production without increasing energy consumption or loads in the system of up to 133 %. New developments of downhole equipment [19], [20], [21] and surface operating procedures can help to improve CO_{2} lifecycle footprint of the oil production by sucker rod pumps.
This publication presents a fully coupled dynamic model of the downhole and surface components, used to evaluate the novel frequency elastic drive mode approach for sucker rod pumping systems. The field tests show the verification of the model and its capabilities. Compared to many others, the proposed method, introduced in this publication, does not require hardware adjustments or affect the controller code or parameters itself; just the reference value calculation of the speed controller is modified. In addition, the capabilities of the wire rope technology, which represents an alternative to the standard rod string are shown.
2. Methodology: frequencyelastic drive mode
The motor speed and torque evaluation have shown that a conventionally driven sucker rod pump is a very rigid system. A large torque is required during the polished rod’s upstroke and the upwards movement of the counterweights. Fig. 2 indicates that a negative torque is generated by the system, which causes the motor speed to pass its synchronal speed and change the motor’s operation mode into a generator. The energy generated can just be used under limitations, like an active frontend mentioned before.
Fig. 2. Motor speed and torque
The rigid system movement results in significant acceleration and deceleration loads in the downhole system. To overcome this problem, without lowefficiency ultrahigh slip motors, the novel frequencyelastic drive mode was developed and tested. This new drive mode is a pure software solution implemented in the controller of the frequency converter. It evaluates the change of the motor power requirements and adjusts the motor speed accordingly in realtime. The proposed advantages are:
1) Reduction of the cyclic rod string and pump loading.
2) Net torque and power reduction.
3) Saving of electric energy.
4) Increase in pump lifetime.
The novel drive mode’s starting point is the definition of two constants: a time constant ${C}_{T}$ and a proportional constant ${C}_{K}$. The time constant is used for filtering, whereas the proportional constant defines the system elasticity's degree. The effective power ${P}_{eff}$, provided by the frequency converter, to the controller is taken to evaluate the effective power gradient $d{P}_{eff}$ (Eq. (1)):
The buildup of undesirable oscillations is suppressed by exponential data smoothing of the effective power gradient (Eq. (2)):
Where $d{{P}^{*}}_{eff,k}$ is the actual smoothed estimated value, $d{{P}^{*}}_{eff,k1}$ is the smoothed estimated value of the previous time step. Exponential smoothing is a time series analysis method for shortterm forecasting from a sample with periodic historical data. The exponential smoothing enables a higher weighting with increasing actuality. The aging of the measured values is compensated. The smoothing factor $\alpha $ defines the weighting of the actual and historical values. Eq. (3) indicates that the longer the time constant, the bigger the smoothing effect and the higher the historical events’ weighting:
The proportional constant is used to adjust the motor set frequency ${f}_{set}$ in the frequency converter according to the system’s needs to improve its elasticity (Eq. (4)):
The derived new motor set frequency ${f}_{set,k}$ is handed over as a reference value for the speed controller, which adjusts the electric motor's operation speed accordingly. The novel frequencyelastic drive mode is tested in a numerical model of the sucker rod pumping system to prepare the field test.
3. Analysis: frequencyelastic drive mode modeling
A numerical model is set up to evaluate the concept of the proposed frequencyelastic drive mode and to enable the simulation of pumping systems not yet installed. The model considers the complete pumping system, starting at the variable speed drive, the pump jack, and the downhole system. The sucker rod pumping system’s numerical model can be split into two parts; the downhole system and the surface system. The downhole system describes the rod string’s behavior, and the downhole pump is connected by the polished rod to the surface system, which simulates the pump jack's dynamics.
3.1. Surface system
The first element of the surface system is the frequency converter, which powers the electric motor and rotates through the belt to drive the gear reducer’s input shaft (Fig. 3). At a certain power rating of the electric motor, it is necessary to use a frequency converter, due to the needed limitation of the inrush currents at the startup. Besides a field orientated closedloop controlled operation also a higher motor dynamic can be achieved compared to a direct gridconnected motor. A belt connects the electric motor and the gear reducer intake shaft, causing additional damping.
Fig. 3. Surface system
A physical model of the induction motor is used for modeling. The utilized motor and frequency converter types are known, but the applied control parameters not. To overcome this problem a fundamental wave model for the air gap flux of the electric motor is applied and combined with a standard control loop. The threephase system of the electric motor is transformed via Clarke and Park transformation into a twophase system, which is rotating aligned with the rotor flux space vector.
Fig. 4. a) Representation of the induction motor windings. The current through the windings is transformed via a Clarke transformation into a 2 phase system; b) a Park transformation is applied to have a rotating reference frame. (S: stator coordination system, R: rotor coordination system, $\psi $ rotor flux orientated coordination system; $\alpha =\varrho +\phi $)
a)
b)
The angular velocity $\omega $ of the rotor is:
where $p$ is the number of pole pairs of the motor and $\dot{\phi}$ is the change of the electrical angle. To simplify the equations the main inductance ${L}_{h}$, the stator stray inductance ${L}_{\sigma ,S}$, the rotor stray inductance ${L}_{\sigma ,R}$, the stator winding and supply cable resistance ${R}_{S}$ and the rotor resistance ${R}_{R}$ are used to form the following terms. The index $S$ stands for stator and $R$ for the rotor:
${L}_{S}={L}_{\sigma ,S}+{L}_{h},$
${L}_{\sigma}=\frac{\left({L}_{S}{L}_{R}{{L}_{h}}^{2}\right)}{{L}_{R}},$
${R}_{\sigma}={R}_{s}+{\left(\frac{{L}_{h}}{{L}_{R}}\right)}^{2}{R}_{R}.$
The space vector ${{i}_{s}}^{\psi}$ is described by Eq. (7), where $\psi $ is the reference frame:
where $d$ is the real and q the imaginary part of the space vector and $j$ is the imaginary variable. The main equation for describing the real and imaginary component of the electric stator current can be written in the following way:
where ${u}_{S}$ is the applied stator voltage, ${i}_{S}$ is the stator current, $\dot{\alpha}$ is the angle between the real axis and the $\psi $ reference frame, and ${\mathrm{\Psi}}_{R}$ is the rotor flux. Due to the alignment of the coordination system to the real axis of the flux space vector, there is no imaginary component for the flux in the rotating frame (${{\mathrm{\Psi}}_{R}}^{\psi}={\mathrm{\Psi}}_{R,d}+{j}_{0}$). The differential equation for the real component of the flux is:
The angle $\dot{\varrho}$for the flux orientated reference frame is calculated with the following equation:
The torque of the induction motor is calculated by Eq. (11):
where $T$ describes the torque of the electric motor. The delivered model to describe the induction motor electrically has an order of four. The developed control system consists out of two loops, one for controlling flux and one for controlling the speed of rotation. The control parameters were selected in a way to meet the behaviour of the measurements.
The motor shaft drives the Vbelt pulley. The Vbelt dampens the vibrations of the motor and drives the gear reducer input shaft. The Vbelt damping effect is dependent on the properties of the Vbelt and can be modeled by a combination of a transitional spring and a transitional damper [22]. A detailed analysis of the Vbelt behavior was presented by Xing and Dong [23]. The Vbelt behavior is described by two partial differential equations, one for the motor sheave pulley and another one for the gear reducer sheave. The influence of the slide angle and the equivalent rotational inertia are considered.
The gear reducer output shaft drives the pump jack, which the fourbar linkage system can describe geometry. John Svinos introduced a set of equations that allow the kinematic analysis of any component within the problem, for Conventional, Mark II and Air Balanced Units [24], which are used in the presented model. The angular velocity of the crank $\dot{{\theta}_{2}}$ is the basis of the pump jack’s dynamics evaluation. The walking beam movement and the polished rod behavior are depending on the crank’s angular velocity. Inertia effects of the pump jack and the counterweight are calculated based on that. The polished rod position ${P}_{PR}$ polished rod velocity ${V}_{PR}$, and the polished rod acceleration ${A}_{PR}$ is the linkage of the surface model with the downhole model:
where $A$ represents the distance between the walking beam bearing and the front of the horsehead, ${\theta}_{4}$ is the walking beam angle, and $\delta $ represents a pump jack geometry parameter. The torque factor $TF$ (Eq. (15)) is used to convert the polished rod load ${F}_{PR}$ into torque at the gear reducer’s output shaft ${T}_{load}$ (Eq. (16)) [25]:
3.2. Downhole system
The downhole system accounts for the dynamics of the sucker rod string and the pump. A socalled transfer function is used to describe the rod string’s behavior, where the pump behavior represents the load boundary condition and the polished rod movement, representing the displacement boundary condition. In history, several transfer function types have been developed, where most of them are based on the viscous damped wave equation, introduced by S. G. Gibbs in the 1960ies [26]:
where $u$ is the displacement in the $x$direction along the rod string, t is the time; a is the velocity of sound in the sucker rods, $x$ is the observed position, $v$ is a dimensionless viscous damping coefficient, and $L$ is the total length of the sucker rod string. The nature of the viscous damped wave equation comes along with some limitations. The secondorder damped partial differential equation (Eq. (17)) accounts for the stresses in the sucker rod string, inertia effects, and fluid friction in vertical wellbores. Neither wellbore trajectory nor Coulomb friction is considered. As a result, the viscous damped wave equation’s application is limited to vertical wellbores, except some modifications or a workaround is considered.
Many scientists have used the work of Gibbs as a basis for their research [27], who have reported valuable results. The standard solution method is the ﬁnite difference method [26], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34]. The here shown model uses the finite differences method to solve the viscous damped wave equation. The rod string is divided into equal element length increments $\mathrm{\Delta}x$ and the time is discretized into increments of $\mathrm{\Delta}t$. The maximum rod element length should be between 50 and 100 meters to achieve a good result quality. $\mathrm{\Delta}t$ is chosen according to the Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy (CFL) condition [35], which indicates that the sound wave has to pass the length increment $\mathrm{\Delta}x$ at least in the time increment $\mathrm{\Delta}t$ Eq. (18). Literature indicates that three pumping cycles are sufficient to eliminate the initial startup effects [28]:
The finite differences scheme can be visualized as a twodimensional grid of displacement information. Fig. 5 shows the scheme for the sucker rod pumping system. The $x$direction represents the time $j$, whereas the $y$direction represents the space $i$. At the position $i=$ 1, the polished rod is situated, and at $i=m$, there is the downhole pump. Time step $j=$ 1 indicates the start and $j=n$ the end of the simulation. The constant parameters of Eq. 17 are summarized in constant ${c}_{1}$ (Eq. 19) and ${c}_{2}$_{}(Eq. 20):
Eq. (17) can be discretized by using the finite forward difference in time for the first derivative Eq. (21) and the central finite differences in time Eq. (22) and Eq. (23) space for the second derivatives:
Through the use of Eq. (19) to Eq. (23) and a rearrangement to express the displacement ${u}_{i,j+1}$ at the requested time step, the discretized equation Eq. (17) can be written as Eq. (24):
Eq. (24) combines the displacement information of four points to determine the displacement information of the requested point. This socalled finite differences stencil at center ${u}_{i,j}$ is moved through the grid, starting from the node ${u}_{\mathrm{2,2}}$ downwards in space direction. When the final space node is reached, the stencil continues at the next step.
Fig. 5. Finite differences scheme for the sucker rod pumping system
Fig. 5 indicates the necessity of two initial and two boundary conditions. The initial conditions define the displacement information at all space nodes for the first two time steps. The simulation starts from the static condition; thus, initial displacement Eq. (25) and velocity v are equal to zero:
The backward finite difference is used to define the node velocity Eq. (26), representing the node displacement gradient:
This representation implies that the first two time steps’ velocity equals zero Eq. (27):
The surface boundary condition is given by the polished rod’s movement and defines the displacement at nodes ${u}_{1,j}$. The pump boundary condition ${u}_{m,j}$ is defined by the pump load. One needs to distinguish between upanddownstroke and the fluid load transfer between tubing and sucker rods. At the beginning of the upstroke, the rods' fluid load is taken from the anchored tubing. The rod string stretches, but there is no relative movement between the pump plunger and the tubing. As soon as the rod string carries the total fluid load, the plunger starts to move upwards. In addition to fluid load, velocitydependent forces and acceleration forces start to act on the plunger Eq. (28):
where $W$ is the fluid load, $E$ is Young’s modulus of the rod material, $A$ is the rod crosssection, ${K}_{v}$ is the proportional velocity coefficient, $v$ is the plunger’s velocity, ${K}_{a}$ is the proportional acceleration coefficient, and a is the plunger’s acceleration. At the top dead center, the fluid load is handed over again to the tubing string, the standing valve closes, and the traveling valve opens. Again, there is no relative movement between the tubing string and the pump’s plunger during this procedure. During the plunger’s downstroke, buoyancy, velocity, and dependent acceleration forces are acting on it Eq. (29):
B represents the buoyant force, the displacement trend for the investigated nodes is the key to further evaluating rod string loads, velocities, stresses, production rate, and power requirements. The polished rod load ${F}_{PR}$ can be evaluated by calculating the top section's rod stretch Eq. (30). The model itself does not account for the gravitational force ${F}_{G}$ of the rod string and is added during the postprocessing step:
The damping coefficient is the only unknown when using the viscous damped wave equation as a transfer function. A low damping coefficient results in unusual fluctuations of the dynamometer card, whereas a high damping coefficient causes a ballooning of the dynamometer card. An ideal damping coefficient is in between and typically in the range of 0.1 [36].
The numerical model was used to develop the frequencyelastic drive mode prior to the field test and to understand the effects, caused by the manipulation of the ${C}_{T}$ and ${C}_{K}$ parameters.
4. Experiment: frequency  elastic drive mode field test
The fieldtested sucker rod pumping system is installed in a vertical wellbore. The wellbore is equipped with an 800 meter long anchored 3 1/2 in tubing string. The downhole pump is a 30225RHAC184 SRABS pump type [37], set at 800 m and operated with a conventional VSD drive at 8.57 strokes per minute. The rod string comprises 280 m of 1” rods grade D, 490 m of 7/8” rods grade D, and 30 m of 2” sinker bars. The recorded fluid properties are 25° API oil gravity, a 113 Pa/m gas gravity, and 98.8 % water cut. Under regular operation the dynamic fluid level is at 475 m from the surface, a casing head pressure of 11 bar and a tubing head pressure of 8 bar are seen. The pump’s gross production rate is 90 m³/day. The pump jack is a conventional one of type C320D256144.
The selected pump jack is equipped with a highspeed measurement system, which allows the recording of sensor readings at a frequency of 5 kHz. For the field test, the frequency converter current and voltage, the crank speed, the polished rod movement, and polished rod load have been measured.
The frequencyelastic drive mode was tested for the set frequencies of 40, 45, 50, 51, and 55 Hz. Several ${C}_{T}$ and ${C}_{K}$ parameters were tested for each set frequency. ${C}_{T}$ was chosen in the range between zero and eight with two as increments. For each ${C}_{T}$ parameter, 12 ${C}_{K}$ parameters in the range between 0 and 320 with an increment of 30 were tested. Fig. 6 summarizes the test procedure regarding the parameters for one frequency.
Fig. 6.${C}_{T}$ and ${C}_{K}$ parameters tests for each frequency – ${C}_{T}$ was defined to start with zero and remain at this value until all ${C}_{K}$ were tested. As a next step, ${C}_{T}$ was increased by two and again all ${C}_{K}$ were tested. After this procedure was finished all parameters the next frequency was applied
5. Results: field test
The recorded data are used to evaluate the actual strokes per minute, the polished rod displacement, and the energy consumptions at the polished rod and frequency converter. Fig. 7 and Fig. 8 compare the polished rod movement and the dynamometer cards for a set frequency of 50 Hz and several ${C}_{T}$ and ${C}_{K}$ parameters.
A low ${C}_{T}$ parameter and a moderate ${C}_{K}$ parameter results in a slowing down of the pump jack during the upstroke and a reduction of the peak velocities. An increase in the ${C}_{T}$ parameter reduces the effect of the ${C}_{K}$ parameter. The dynamometer cards indicate a reduction of the peak polished rod load and an increase of the minimum polished rod load for the frequencyelastic drive mode. The magnitude is depending on the selected parameters. The area of the dynamometer cards slightly reduces with the increase of the parameters, indicating an increase in the system efficiency. Nevertheless, an increase in the system dynamics can be seen.
Fig. 7. Polished rod movement – frequencyelastic drive mode
Fig. 8. The dynamometer card comparison of the standard (black line) and frequencyelastic drive modes indicate a reduction in load and energy consumption. Nevertheless, the dynamics in the downhole system increase. The degree is dependent on the selected parameters. A ${C}_{T}$ parameter equal to two and a ${C}_{K}$ parameter of 120 shows fewer dynamics than a ${C}_{T}$ parameter equal to two and a ${C}_{K}$ parameter of 240. ${C}_{T}$ reduces the effect of ${C}_{K}$ and ${C}_{T}$ equal to 8 and ${C}_{K}$ equal to 120 shows fewer dynamics than the previous parameters
Fig. 9. The SPM is influenced by the ${C}_{T}$ parameters. The influencing range is about 0.3 SPM for ${C}_{T}$ parameters between 0 and 8
The change in frequency, ${C}_{T}$, and ${C}_{K}$ parameters influenced the pumping speed, the loads, and the energy consumption of the pumping system significantly. Fig. 9 presents the actual strokes per minute for the set frequency and the tested ${C}_{T}$ parameters. For the frequency of 51 Hz, just the ${C}_{T}$ parameter of zero was tested. The results show that the actual number of strokes per minute decreases with increasing ${C}_{K}$ parameters but increases with increasing ${C}_{T}$ parameters.
The pumping speed influences the dynamic fluid level (DFL) in the annulus, the tubing (${p}_{tub}$), and casing (${p}_{cas}$) head pressure (Fig. 10 and Fig. 11). The dynamic fluid level is related to the inflow performance of the reservoir. An increase in the pumping speed results in a slight increase in the tubing head pressure, a drop in the casing head pressure, and dynamic fluid level.
Fig. 10. The field tests were performed for a pumping speed range of 6.5 to 9.5 SPM. The tubing head pressure changed from 7.05 bar to 7.5 bar and the fluid level dropped from 527 m to 519 m above the pump intake
Fig. 11. The increase in pumping speed resulted in a marginal reduction of the casing head pressure from 11 bar to about 10.85 for 9.5 SPM
Significant dependencies of the peak polished rod load ($L{C}_{max}$) and the minimum polished rod load ($L{C}_{min}$) have been seen not only for a change in the set frequency but also for a change in the ${C}_{T}$ and ${C}_{K}$ parameters. A substantial increase in the peak polished rod load from 48 kN for 6.5 SPM to 55 kN for 9.5 SPM occurred. The data indicate a parabolic relationship between peak polished rod load and pumping speed. Fig. 12 and Fig. 13 present the peak polished rod to load on SPM behavior for the ${C}_{T}$ and ${C}_{K}$ parameters.
Fig. 12. This plot presents the peak polished rod load recordings for ${C}_{T}$ equal to zero and changing ${C}_{K}$. An increase in the ${C}_{K}$ parameter reduces the peak polished rod load and the pumping speed for the set frequencies of 40, 45, and 51 Hz, whereas an increase in pumping speed and peak polished rod load was seen for the set frequency of 55 Hz. In total, the peak polished rod load increased by 7 kN
Fig. 13. This plot presents the recordings for ${C}_{K}$ equal to 60. The increase of the ${C}_{T}$ parameter increases the pumping speed and an increase in the peak polished rod load for all set frequencies
A drop in the minimum polished rod load has been seen for the increase in the pumping speed in general. Fig. 14 and Fig. 15 summarize the cross plots and the linear trend for defined ${C}_{T}$ and ${C}_{K}$ parameters.
Fig. 16 shows the cross plot of minimum and peak polished rod load for the ${C}_{T}$ parameter equal to two. The trend towards lower polished rod load can be seen for the increase in the ${C}_{K}$ parameter.
In contrast, Fig. 18 presents the polished rod energy consumption and frequency converter energy consumption for all ${C}_{T}$ parameters. It shows that the polished rod energy consumption decreases with the increase of the ${C}_{K}$ parameter for all set frequencies. But more importantly, the frequency converter energy consumption increases slightly for 40 and 45 Hz, but drops for 50, 51, and 55 Hz. This is the result of the pump jack dynamics.
Fig. 14. This plot presents the peak polished rod load recordings for ${C}_{T}$ equal to zero and changing ${C}_{K}$. An increase in the ${C}_{K}$ parameter reduces the minimum polished rod load and the pumping speed for the set frequency of 40 Hz. An increase in pumping speed and the minimum polished rod load was seen for the set frequency of 55 Hz. For 45, 50, and 51 Hz no trend can be identified
Fig. 15. This plot presents the recordings for ${C}_{K}$ equal to 60. The increase of the ${C}_{T}$ parameter increases the minimum polished rod load for the set frequency of 40 Hz. For the set frequencies of 45, 50, 51, and 55 Hz the minimum polished rod load drops by the increase of ${C}_{T}$. In total the minimum polished rod load dropped by 6 kN
Fig. 16. Cross plot – minimum and peak polished rod load
The energy consumption of the pump jack was evaluated at the polished rod (${E}_{mpr}$) and the frequency converter (${E}_{mo}$). Fig. 17 shows the cross plot of polished rod energy consumption on the yaxis and the frequency converter energy consumption on the $x$axis for all ${C}_{K}$ parameters. The increase in the ${C}_{T}$ parameter results in a slight reduction of the frequency converter energy consumption and the polished rod energy consumption for low set frequencies. For higher set frequencies the energy consumption increased.
Fig. 17. Cross plot of polished rod energy consumption and frequency converter energy consumption for all ${C}_{K}$ parameters
Fig. 18. Cross plot of polished rod energy consumption and frequency converter energy consumption for all ${C}_{T}$ parameters
Fig. 19 indicates the energy consumption reduction based on the actual pumping speed. For the given system the frequency elastic drive mode shows a significant energy reduction potential of up to 5 percent for a pumping speed above 8 strokes per minute. Below that more energy is required to operate the system. Nevertheless, the color bar indicates the peak polished rod load reduction. The frequency elastic drive mode reduces the peak load for low and moderate pumping speed but causes an increase for high pumping speed. As a result, for the given pumping system there is the optimum range of application.
The evaluation of the field test results has shown that the application of a low ${C}_{T}$ parameter in combination with a high ${C}_{K}$ parameter influences the pumping systems towards energy saving and load reduction. The frequency elastic drive mode yields the best results for the fieldtested pumping system and optimized parameters in the pumping speed range between 7 to 10 strokes per minute.
Fig. 19. Energy consumption reduction based on actual pumping speed
6. Discussion: model evaluation
The numerical model, used to develop the frequencyelastic drive mode, was built by 50meter space increment and 5 milliseconds of time increment. The actual verification of the model with the field data was performed for regular pumping operation without the novel frequency  elastic drive mode algorithms after the development. Fig. 20, Fig. 21, Fig. 22, and Fig. 23 present a detailed comparison of the numerical model results and the field test recordings. The polished rod displacement comparison shows an excellent match. The surface dynamometer card comparison and the motor power consumption show a good match. Nevertheless, some discrepancies can be seen.
The motor shaft speed was 107 rad/s slightly higher than the simulation result with 106 rad/s at the time step of 3 seconds.
Fig. 20. Polished rod position comparison
Fig. 21. Dynamometer card comparison
Fig. 22. Motor power consumption comparison
Fig. 23. Motor shaft speed comparison
7. Conclusions
The research has shown that software adjustments at the drive controller enable an improvement in the energy efficiency of the sucker rod pumping system. By manipulation of the set frequency of the frequency converter with a time constant and a proportional constant, an optimized pumping system motion is achieved. The time constant is responsible for data filtering, whereas the proportional constant scales the adjustment of the set frequency based on the load at the electric motor.
A numerical model has been developed and used to verify the frequency – elastic drive mode in parallel to an extensive field test. The numerical model accounts for all relevant components of the sucker rod pumping system and is verified by the field test recordings. A detailed analysis of the field test recordings resulted in the fact that the effect of the frequencyelastic drive mode is significantly influenced by the sucker rod pump configuration and operation conditions. The field test was performed on a vertical wellbore, equipped with a 800 m long rod string and a 30225 RHAC SRABS pump. For the system, tested in the field, a significant energy consumption reduction of up to 5 percent and a polished rod load reduction of 3 percent was achieved.
The model is a convenient way to perform a parameter study and further investigate the effects of the frequencyelastic drive mode for other well configurations before applying the novel frequencyelastic drive mode in the field on other wells.
References
 Market Research Report, “Artificial Lift Systems Market  Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends, and Forecast, 2019 – 2027,” 2019, www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/industryreports/artificialliftsystemmarket100467 [Search CrossRef]
 T. Nguye, “Sucker rod pump,” in Artificial Lift Methods. Petroleum Engineering, Springer, Cham, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/9783030407209_5 [Publisher]
 T. A. Aliev, A. H. Rzayev, G. A. Guluyev, T. A. Alizada, and N. E. Rzayeva, “Robust technology and system for management of sucker rod pumping units in oil wells,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 99, pp. 47–56, Jan. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.06.010 [Publisher]
 G. Takács, “SuckerRod Pumping Manual,” First Edition, Tulsa, PennWell Corporation, 2003 [Search CrossRef]
 E. Chevelcha, C. J. Langbauer, and H. Hofstaetter, “Listening sucker rod pumps: stroke’s signature,” in SPE Artificial Lift ConferenceAmericas, May 2013, https://doi.org/10.2118/165035ms [Publisher]
 D. Kochtik and C. Langbauer, “Volumetric efficiency evaluation of suckerrodpumping applications performed on a pump testing facility,” in SPE Middle East Artificial Lift Conference and Exhibition, Nov. 2018, https://doi.org/10.2118/192454ms [Publisher]
 C. Langbauer et al., “Development and efficiency testing of sucker rod pump downhole desanders,” SPE Production & Operations, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 406–421, Jan. 2020, https://doi.org/10.2118/200478pa [Publisher]
 C. Langbauer and G. Kaserer, “Industrial application of a linear drive system in a pump testing facility,” in 2018 17th International Ural Conference on AC Electric Drives (ACED), Mar. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1109/aced.2018.8341726 [Publisher]
 C. Langbauer and F. FazeliTehrani,” Pump test facility for research, testing, training, and teaching,” (in German), Erdöl Erdgas Kohle Magazin, Vol. 135, No. 7/8, pp. 35–42, 2020, https://doi.org/10.19225/200703 [Search CrossRef]
 N. Vukajlovic, D. Milicevic, B. Popadic, B. Dumnic, D. Jerkan, and V. Vasic, “Increasing the Induction Machine Power Capacity using Industrial Frequency Converter,” in IEEE EUROCON 2019 – 18th International Conference on Smart Technologies, Jul. 2019, https://doi.org/10.1109/eurocon.2019.8861552 [Publisher]
 F. A. Gizatullin, M. I. Khakimyanov, and F. F. Khusainov, “Features of electric drive sucker rod pumps for oil production,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 944, p. 12039, Jan. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/17426596/944/1/012039 [Publisher]
 M. Khakimyanov and F. Khusainov,” Ways of increase energy efficiency of electric drives sucker rod pump for oil production,” in 2018 10th International Conference on Electrical Power Drive System, 2018. [Publisher]
 E. M. Solodkiy, V. P. Kazantsev, and D. A. Dadenkov, “Improving the energy efficiency of the suckerrod pump via its optimal counterbalancing,” in 2019 International Russian Automation Conference, Sep. 2019, https://doi.org/10.1109/rusautocon.2019.8867737 [Publisher]
 E. Ferrigno, D. El Khouri, and G. Moreno, “Downhole plunger speed study in sucker rod high gor and high friction wells,” in SPE Artificial Lift Conference and Exhibition – Americas, Aug. 2018, https://doi.org/10.2118/190932ms [Publisher]
 Z. Fu, Q. Wang, L. Wang, J. Xu, Y. Qiu, and C. Li, “Application of flexible variable frequency drive systems in lowvolume pumping wells,” in SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Oct. 2020, https://doi.org/10.2118/201741ms [Publisher]
 C. Tan et al., “Review of variable speed drive technology in beam pumping units for energysaving,” Energy Reports, Vol. 6, pp. 2676–2688, Nov. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.09.018 [Publisher]
 Z.M. Feng et al., “Variable speed drive optimization model and analysis of comprehensive performance of beam pumping unit,” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, Vol. 191, p. 107155, Aug. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107155 [Publisher]
 K. Palka and J. Czyz, “Optimizing downhole fluid production of suckerrod pumps with variable motor speed,” SPE Production & Operations, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 346–352, Apr. 2009, https://doi.org/10.2118/113186pa [Publisher]
 C. Langbauer, E. Chevelcha, and H. Hofstäetter, “Buckling prevention using the tensioning device,” in SPE Artificial Lift ConferenceAmericas, May 2013, https://doi.org/10.2118/165013ms [Publisher]
 C. Langbauer, “Sucker Rod AntiBuckling system Analysis,” Ph.D. Thesis, Montanuniversitaet Leoben, 2015. [Search CrossRef]
 L. Clemens, F. Rudolf, H. Manuel, and H. Herbert, “Sucker rod antibuckling system to enable costeffective oil production,” in SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Oct. 2018, https://doi.org/10.2118/191865ms [Publisher]
 Mathworks, „Belt drive – power transmission system with taut belt connecting two pulleys,” 2021, https://de.mathworks.com/help/physmod/sdl/ref/beltdrive.html [Search CrossRef]
 M. Xing and S. Dong, “A new simulation model for a beampumping system applied in energy saving and resourceconsumption reduction,” SPE Production & Operations, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 130–140, Jan. 2015, https://doi.org/10.2118/173190pa [Publisher]
 J. G. Svinos, “Exact kinematic analysis of pumping units,” in SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Oct. 1983, https://doi.org/10.2118/12201ms [Publisher]
 S. G. Gibbs, “Computing gearbox torque and motor loading for beam pumping units with consideration of inertia effects,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, Vol. 27, No. 9, pp. 1153–1159, Sep. 1975, https://doi.org/10.2118/5149pa [Publisher]
 S. G. Gibbs, “Predicting the behavior of suckerrod pumping systems,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, Vol. 15, No. 7, pp. 769–778, Jul. 1963, https://doi.org/10.2118/588pa [Publisher]
 P. Eisner, C. Langbauer, and R. Fruhwirth, “A novel finite elements method for sucker rod pump downhole dynamometer card determination,” Journal of Liquid and Gaseous Energy Resources, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2021. [Publisher]
 D. J. Schafer and J. W. Jennings, “An investigation of analytical and numerical sucker rod pumping mathematical models,” in SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Sep. 1987, https://doi.org/10.2118/16919ms [Publisher]
 T. A. Everitt and J. W. Jennings, “An improved finitedifference calculation of downhole dynamometer cards for suckerrod pumps,” SPE Production Engineering, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 121–127, Feb. 1992, https://doi.org/10.2118/18189pa [Publisher]
 V. Pons, “Optimal stress calculations for sucker rod pumping systems,” in SPE Artificial Lift Conference & ExhibitionNorth America, Oct. 2014, https://doi.org/10.2118/171346ms [Publisher]
 O. J. Romero and P. Almeida, “Numerical simulation of the suckerrod pumping system,” Ingeniería e Investigación, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 4–11, Nov. 2014, https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.v34n3.40835 [Publisher]
 A. Aditsania, S. D. Rahmawati, P. Sukarno, and E. Soewono, “Modeling and simulation performance of sucker rod beam pump,” AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1677, p. 080008, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4930739 [Publisher]
 D. Wang and H. Li, “Prediction and analysis of polished rod dynamometer card in sucker rod pumping system with wear,” Shock and Vibration, Vol. 2018, pp. 1–10, Nov. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4979405 [Publisher]
 J. Yin, D. Sun, and Y. Yang, “A novel method for diagnosis of suckerrod pumping systems based on the polishedrod load vibration in vertical wells,” SPE Journal, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 2470–2481, Jun. 2020, https://doi.org/10.2118/201228pa [Publisher]
 A. Carlos, C. A. De Moura, and C. S. Kubrusly, “The Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy (CFL) Condition  80 Years After Its Discovery,” Springer Science+Business Media New York, 2013. [Publisher]
 S. G. Gibbs, “Rod Pumping – Modern Methods of Design, Diagnosis, and Surveillance,” 2012. [Search CrossRef]
 C. Langbauer, R. K. Fruhwirth, and L. Volker, “Sucker Rod Antibuckling System: Development and Field Application,” SPE Production & Operations, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 327–342, Mar. 2021, https://doi.org/10.2118/205352pa [Publisher]
Cited By
A. Nakataev, A. Ziuzev, S. Tecle 
2022

Artur Sagdatullin 
2021
