Published: 13 October 2023

Assessment of CO2 leakage using mechanistic modelling approach for CO2 injection in deep saline aquifer of Lithuanian basin in presence of fault and fractures

Shankar Lal Dangi1
Shruti Malik2
Pijus Makauskas3
Vilte Karliute4
Ravi Sharma5
Mayur Pal6
1, 5Indian Institute of Technology, Department of Earth Science, IIT Roorkee, India
2, 3, 4, 6Kaunas University of Technology, Department of Mathematical Modelling, Kaunas, Lithuania
Corresponding Author:
Shankar Lal Dangi
Views 37
Reads 19
Downloads 62


Injecting CO2 into deep saline aquifers is a prominent strategy for carbon capture and storage (CCS) to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. However, ensuring the long-term integrity of CO2 storage is crucial to prevent leakage and potential environmental hazards. This paper investigates the impact of fracture permeability on CO2 leakage volumes in the context of CO2 injection into Syderiai deep saline aquifer for carbon capture and storage (CCS) applications. It explores the relationship between fracture permeability and the potential for CO2 leakage, as well as the volume of CO2 dissolved in water above and below the cap rock. Furthermore, the study examines how the leakage volume may evolve over time in Syderiai deep saline aquifer. A mechanistic model of Syderiai deep saline aquifer, of Lithuanian basin, was developed based on average permeability, porosity, NTG and thickness (Fig. 1) and is used in this analysis.

Fig. 1Permeability distribution Grid block for 1000 md Fracture and Soluble CO2 in water for 1000 md Fracture after 100 year

Permeability distribution Grid block for 1000 md Fracture  and Soluble CO2 in water for 1000 md Fracture after 100 year


  • David Reiner, Xi Liang, X. Sun, Yizhong Zhu, and Di Li, “Stakeholder Attitudes towards Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage Technologies in China,” in International Climate Change Conference, pp. 29–31, May 2007.
  • J. T. Birkholzer, C. M. Oldenburg, and Q. Zhou, “CO2 migration and pressure evolution in deep saline aquifers,” International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 40, pp. 203–220, Sep. 2015,
  • N. Castelletto, G. Gambolati, and P. Teatini, “Geological CO2 sequestration in multi‐compartment reservoirs: Geomechanical challenges,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol. 118, No. 5, pp. 2417–2428, 2013.
  • A. Zappone et al., “Fault sealing and caprock integrity for CO2 storage: an in situ injection experiment,” Solid Earth, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 319–343, 2021.
  • S. Bachu and J. J. Adams, “Sequestration of CO2 in geological media in response to climate change: capacity of deep saline aquifers to sequester CO2 in solution,” Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 44, No. 20, pp. 3151–3175, Dec. 2003,
  • “Global Status of CCS 2021 CCS ACCELERATING TO NET ZERO, Global C.C.S. Institute Report,”.
  • S. Malik, P. Makauskas, V. Karaliute, R. Sharma, and M. Pal, “Assessing Long-term fate of geological CO2 storage in Lithuania: A machine learning approach for pore-scale processes and reservoir characterization,” in The 12th Trondheim Conference on CO2 Capture, Transport and Storage, 2023.
  • M. Pal, S. Malik, V. Karaliūtė, P. Makauskas, and R. Sharma, “Assessing the feasibility of carbon capture and storage potential in Lithuanian geological formations: a simulation-based assessment,” in 84th EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Vol. 2023, No. 1, pp. 1–5, 2023,
  • B. Metz, O. Davidson, H. Coninck, M. Loos, and L. Meyer, “IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage,” Cambridge University Press, New York, NY (United States), 2005.

Cited by

About this article

07 September 2023
11 September 2023
13 October 2023
carbon capture and storage
CO2 leakage
leakage risk
faults and fractures