Feature extraction for rolling element bearing weak fault based on MOMEDA and ICEEMDAN
Lei Zhao^{1} , Yongxiang Zhang^{2} , Danchen Zhu^{3}
^{1, 2, 3}Naval University of Engineering Power Engineering Marine Engineering, Wuhan, 430033, China
^{1}Corresponding author
Journal of Vibroengineering, Vol. 20, Issue 6, 2018, p. 23522362.
https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2018.19309
Received 25 October 2017; received in revised form 27 February 2018; accepted 20 April 2018; published 30 September 2018
There are always the nonlinear and nonstationary characteristics and periodic pulse in vibration signals of rolling element bearings when there are partial faults in those bearings. Improved Complete Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition with Adaptive Noise (ICEEMDAN) overcomes the presence of spurious modes and residual noise in Complete Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition with Adaptive Noise (CEEMDAN), but it cannot clearly and accurately extract the weak fault feature of rolling element bearings under the strong background noise. Here, Multipoint Optimal Minimum Entropy Deconvolution Adjusted (MOMEDA) was proposed. A bearing simulator was used to collect vibration signals of bearing inner and outer race, which was enhanced by MOMEDA, decomposed into several Intrinsic Mode Functions(IMFs) by ICEEMDAN, and analyzed by the envelope demodulation, finally gaining the frequency of shaft speed, BPFI (ball pass frequency, inner race) and harmonics, sidebands spaced, BPFO (ball pass frequency, outer race) and harmonics. The results show that this method can be used to accurately extract different frequency components of bearing fault vibration signals and diagnose bearing different fault location.
Keywords: rolling element bearings, feature extraction, MOMEDA, ICEEMDAN.
1. Introduction
Rolling element bearings are one of the most common components that are widely used in rotating machinery, and their failure is one of the most frequent reasons for machine breakdown. There are always the nonlinear and nonstationary characteristics and periodic pulse in vibration signals of rolling element bearings when there are partial faults in those bearings. But this faulty pulse has a large period, a low energy proportion and it is susceptible to the background noise. It is difficult to extract the fault characteristic frequency and to diagnose the bearing fault location effectively. Moreover, the traditional signal analysis technology is difficult to achieve good results. Therefore, the fault feature extraction of bearings based on multiplex methods has become a hot spot of research.
Empirical mode decomposition (EMD) is an adaptive approach to the decomposition of nonlinear and nonstationary signal presented originally by Huang et al. [1] and has been widely applied to bearing failures detection [24]. However, there are still some problems to be studied, such as modemixing and boundary effect. A novel signal processing method, called ensemble EMD (EEMD), was proposed by Wu and Huang [5] in 2009 on the basis of EMD. In order to solve modemixing problem of EMD, EEMD based on assistant Gaussian white noise remains the continuity under different scale [6]. Because the reconstructed signal includes residual noise, it increases the reconstruction error and reduces the completeness of signal decomposition significantly. In order to overcome it, Torres et al [7] proposed CEEMDAN. An adaptive noise is added at each stage of the decomposition and a unique residue is computed to obtain each mode. As an adaptive signal processing method, it remains the completeness of EMD, overcomes modemixing phenomenon of EMD and suppresses the reconstruction error [8]. But it still has two drawbacks: the existence of spurious modes and the presence of residual noise in the modes. Taking these into account, Colominas et al. [9] proposed a new algorithm called Improved CEEMDAN (ICEEMDAN), which calculates the local means of original signal to obtain each mode. Not only can the noise in the modes be reduced, but also the spurious modes caused by overlap of components can be decreased.
However, as a practical matter, the fault feature is weak in the early fault period of bearings, and susceptible to random noise. The periodic pulse is often buried in the background noise, and is not easy to identify and extract. In order to enhance the periodic impact component in the vibration signal of bearing fault, and reduce the noise interference, MOMEDA was proposed [10]. As a noniterative deconvolution approach, MOMEDA settles a deconvolution problem by an infinite impulse train as the goal and the optimal filter solution can be given directly.
2. The Principle of the MOMEDA
Given a simple bearing vibration signal:
where $x\left(n\right)$ is the measured bearing vibration, $h\left(n\right)$ is transmission path, $y\left(n\right)$ is an impulse signal, and $e\left(n\right)$ is the white noise. Due to the influence of external context and transmission path, $y\left(n\right)$ is attenuated to $x\left(n\right)$ and loses the properties of original signal. It makes the frequency components complex and the energy distribution odd, which increases the entropy. The objective of the deconvolution is to find the inverse filter $f\left(n\right)$, which recovers the properties of signal $y\left(n\right)$:
Given definition of the Multi KurtosisNorm (MKN):
Select the $f\left(l\right)$ corresponding to the maximum MKN:
where the target vector, $\overrightarrow{t}$, is a constant vector that defines the location and weightings of the goal impulses to be deconvolved. $\overrightarrow{f}$ is filter coefficients, $\overrightarrow{f}={\left[{f}_{1},{f}_{2},\cdots {f}_{L}\right]}^{T}$. $L$ is a filter length.
The above optimization problem is equivalent to solving the equation:
$={\Vert \overrightarrow{y}\Vert}^{1}\xb7\left(\left({t}_{1}{\overrightarrow{M}}_{1}+{t}_{2}{\overrightarrow{M}}_{2}+\cdots +{t}_{NL}{\overrightarrow{M}}_{NL}\right)\right){\Vert \overrightarrow{y}\Vert}^{3}{\overrightarrow{t}}^{T}\overrightarrow{y}{X}_{0}\overrightarrow{y}.$
Given ${t}_{1}{\overrightarrow{M}}_{1}+{t}_{2}{\overrightarrow{M}}_{2}+\cdots +{t}_{NL}{\overrightarrow{M}}_{NL}={X}_{0}\overrightarrow{t}$:
Since $\overrightarrow{y}={X}_{0}^{T}\overrightarrow{f}$, and assuming ${\left({X}_{0}{X}_{0}^{T}\right)}^{1}$ exists:
Or in matrix form:
On account of space limitations, no specific deduction is given. Please refer to reference [10,11] for details.
3. ICEEMDAN
3.1. The principle of the ICEEMDAN
ICEEMDAN algorithm can be described as follows:
Step 1. Calculate by EMD the local means of $I$ realizations to obtain the first residue:
where ${w}^{i}$ is a realization of white Gaussian noise with zero mean and unit variance, ${\epsilon}_{0}$ is a selection of the signaltonoise ratio (SNR).
Calculate the first mode:
Step 2. Calculate the second residue:
where ${E}_{2}$ is the second mode by EMD.
Then define $IM{F}_{2}$:
Step 3. For $k=$ 3, …, $K$ calculate the $k$th residue:
Then define $IM{F}_{k}$:
Step 4. Continue to sift until the obtained residue cannot be further decomposed (residue has less than three local extremes):
where $R$ is the final residue, $K$ is the total number of $IMF$. Therefore, the signal of $x$ can be expressed as:
3.2. Comparison analysis of simulation signals
In order to demonstrate the advantages of ICEEMDAN, The EMD, EEMD, CEEMDAN, and ICEEMDAN are compared by simulation signal. The simulation signal $x={x}_{1}+{x}_{2}$ in Fig. 1 contains a simple harmonic wave ${x}_{1}$ of 25 Hz, and a 110 Hz wavelet ${x}_{2}$ that is overlain at 0.4 s to 0.6 s. The simulation signal $x$ is decomposed by EMD, EEMD, CEEMDAN and ICEEMDAN respectively.
Fig. 2 is the result of EMD. It can be seen from the diagram that there exists mode mixing in EMD. The high frequency component is not sifted alone in IMF1, which contains low frequency component. Similarly, there is different modemixing in other IMFs. This complicates signal analysis and makes it difficult to identify the exact components of each IMF.
Fig. 1. The waveform of simulated signal
Fig. 2. The waveform of EMD
Fig. 3 is the result of EEMD with standard deviation 0.1 of the added Gauss white noise. As can be seen from the diagram, the high frequency wavelets of 110 Hz between 0.4 s and 0.6 s are fully recovered in IMF1, but there is different modemixing in other IMFs.
Fig. 4 is the result of CEEMD, where its parameters are the same as EEMD. It is observed from Fig. 4 that the IMF1 is similar to EEMD’s, IMF2 and IMF3 are mixed up with the residual noise and compared with EMD(IMF3IMF6) and EEMD(IMF4IMF9), the spurious mode appears in CEEMDAN (IMF6IMF11), which has nothing to do with the original signal.
Fig. 3. The waveform of EEMD
Fig. 4. The waveform of CEEMDAN
Fig. 5 is the result of ICEEMD, which is set with the same parameters as above. As can be seen from the graph, the high frequency component 110 Hz between 0.4 s and 0.6 s are fully recovered in IMF1; a simple harmonic wave 25 Hz is extracted in IMF2. The two signal components in the simulation signal are recovered, and there are no spurious modes. In conclusion, compared with EMD, EEMD and CEEMDAN, ICEEMDAN has obvious advantages in suppressing mode mixing, spurious mode, and mixing residual noise in modes.
4. Bearing fault simulation signals
In order to verify the validity of the method combining MOMEDA with ICEEMDAN, a simple fault model is used to simulate the periodic impact signal produced by the bearing fault, and the white noise is added to simulate the early fault signal of the bearing [12]:
where ${f}_{n}=$ 3000 Hz is carrier frequency, ${x}_{0}=$ 5 is displacement constant, $\xi =$ 0.1 is damping coefficient, $T=$ 0.01 s is the period of impact fault, ${f}_{s}=$ 20 kHz is the sampling frequency, $N=$ 4096 is the sampling number, $t$ is the sampling time, and $n\left(t\right)$ is white noise.
Fig. 5. The waveform of ICEEMDAN
Fig. 6 is the timedomain waveform of bearing simulation signal and by MOMEDA. Because the bearing fault impact signal is affected by noise, it is unable to recognize the fault information. The bearing simulation signal is processed by MOMEDA, and its kurtosis has a sharp rise, which increases from 3.15 to 12.87. What’s more, the impact signal in the timedomain waveform is more obvious.
Fig. 6. Timedomain waveform of bearing simulation signal
The signal after MOMEDA is decomposed into several IMFs by ICEEMDAN, and then the first IMF is analyzed using the envelope demodulation. As shown in Fig. 7, it is obvious that the periodic impact frequency (100 Hz) and its harmonic (200 Hz, 300 Hz, 400 Hz, 500 Hz, etc.) of bearing fault can be seen. In order to verify the necessity of combining the two methods, the bearing simulation signals are not processed by MOMEDA, and the first IMF is obtained by applying ICEEMDAN directly. The envelope spectrum is shown in Fig. 8. The strong noise makes great difficulty in identifying the bearing fault periodic impact frequency clearly and accurately. Simulation analysis shows that the method is effective and suitable for early fault feature extraction of bearings under strong noise.
Fig. 7. Envelope spectrum of IMF1 (processed with MOMEDA)
Fig. 8. The envelope spectrum of IMF1 (not processed with MOMEDA)
5. Experimental verification
As shown in Fig. 9, the test stand consists of a 2 hp motor (left), a torque transducer and encoder (center), a dynamometer (right), and control electronics (not shown). The experimental bearings type is SKF 62052RS [13]. The bearing specifications are shown in Tables 1, 2. Single point faults were introduced to the test bearings using electrodischarge machining with fault diameters of 0.18 mm (depths 0.28 mm) at the inner raceway and outer raceway. The motor speed is 1730 r/min, and the sampling frequency is 12 kHz.
Fig. 9. The schematic diagram of experimental device
Table 1. The bearing size
Ball diameter ($d$ / mm)  Pitch diameter ($D$/ mm)  Inside diameter (${d}_{m}$ / mm)  Outside diameter (${D}_{o}$ / mm)  Rolling element ($Z$)  Contact angle ($\alpha $ / °) 
8  39  25  52  9  0 
Table 2. The bearing defect frequencies
Rotation frequency ($fr$ / Hz)  Ball pass frequency, inner race (BPFI / Hz)  Ball pass frequency, outer race (BPFO / Hz) 
28.83  156.12  103.35 
The timedomain waveform of vibration signals of bearing inner and outer race and one enhanced by MOMEDA are shown in Fig. 10. After being enhanced the bearing vibration signals with MOMEDA, the inner race fault vibration signals’ kurtosis increases from 4.48 to 11.25, and the outer race fault vibration signals’ kurtosis increases from 3.06 to 11.81. Impact components are found in the time domain waveform, but the bearing fault feature is still not clearly identified under the noise.
Then signals are decomposed by ICEEMDAN, and the result is shown in Fig. 11. Finally, IMF1 is demodulated to obtain the envelope spectrum, as shown in Fig. 12.
Fig. 10. Timedomain waveform of bearing vibration signal
a) Inner race fault
b) Outer race fault
Fig. 11. Timedomain waveform of ICEEMDAN
a) Inner race fault
b) Outer race fault
As can be seen from Fig. 12, the vibration signals of the bearing inner race fault include the BPFI and harmonics, sidebands spaced at ${f}_{r}$, and the vibration signals of the bearing outer race fault include BPFO and harmonics. On account of speed fluctuation and rolling element rotation, the actual fault characteristic frequency is slightly lower than the theoretical one, which is normal. By comprehensive analysis, this method can be used for accurate diagnosis of bearing inner race fault and outer race fault, and the analysis results accord with the fact. To test the advantages of this method, three different methods in reference [14] (square envelope spectrum, cepstrum prewhitening, benchmark method) using the same bearing data, were unable to identify the bearing fault characteristic frequency (Without getting into repeating the description owing to space constraints). Therefore, the method based on MOMEDA and ICEEMDAN can accurately extract the weak fault feature of bearing and is of creativity and practical value.
Fig. 12. The envelope spectrum of IMF1
a) Inner race fault
b) Outer race fault
6. Conclusions
Bearing impact feature is weak in the early fault period, and especially vulnerable to other signals. MOMEDA using a noniterative process can deconvolve the signal, enhance the periodic pulse under strong noise, improve the kurtosis and SNR, and apply to enhancing the impact of bearing early fault period.
ICEEMDAN is a new adaptive approach to the decomposition of nonlinear and nonstationary signal. It can overcome the presence of spurious modes and residual noise in modes compared with the traditional mode decomposition (EMD, EEMD, CEEMDAN), and can accurately extract different frequency components of bearing fault vibration signals
References
 Huang N. E., Shen Z., Long S. R., et al. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and nonstationary time series analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A, Vol. 454, Issue 1971, 1998, p. 903995. [Publisher]
 Chen J. X., Cheng L. S., Hu S. L., et al. Fault diagnosis for rolling bearings using modified MahalanobisTaguchi system. Journal of Vibration and Shock, Vol. 36, Issue 5, 2017, p. 151156. [Search CrossRef]
 Zhao D. Z., Li J. Y., Cheng W. D. The method of rolling element bearing fault diagnosis based on IDMM and EMD under timevaring rotational speed and gear noise. Journal of Vibration and Shock, Vol. 35, Issue 10, 2016, p. 101107. [Search CrossRef]
 Ma X. N., Yang S. P. Study of adaptive compound fault diagnosis of rolling bearing. Journal of Vibration and Shock, Vol. 35, Issue 10, 2016, p. 145150. [Search CrossRef]
 Wu Z., Huang N. E. Ensemble empirical mode decomposition: a noise assisted data analysis method. Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis, Vol. 1, Issue 1, 2009, p. 141. [Publisher]
 Liu Y. Q., Li C. X., Liao Y. Y. Fault diagnosis method of bearings based on EEMD and autocorrelation function kurtosis. Journal of Vibration and Shock, Vol. 36, Issue 2, 2017, p. 111116. [Search CrossRef]
 Torres M. E., Colominas M. A., Schlotthauer G., et al. A complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2011. [Search CrossRef]
 Mohanty S., Gupta K. K., Raju K. S. VibroAcoustic Fault Analysis of Bearing Using FFT, EMD, EEMD and CEEMDAN and Their Implication. SpringerVerlag, New York, USA, 2016. [Publisher]
 Colominas M. A., Schlotthauer G., Torres M. E. Improved complete ensemble EMD: a suitable tool for biomedical signal processing. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, Vol. 14, Issue 2, 2014, p. 1929. [Publisher]
 Mcdonald G. L., Zhao Q. Multipoint optimal minimum entropy deconvolution and convolution fix: application to vibration fault detection. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 82, 2017, p. 461477. [Publisher]
 Cabrelli C. A. Minimum entropy deconvolution and simplicity: a noniterative algorithm. Geophysics Vol. 50, Issue 3, 1985, p. 394413. [Publisher]
 Wang X. D., Zi Y. Y., He Z. J. Multiwavelet construction via an adaptive symmetric lifting scheme and its applications for rotating machinery fault diagnosis. Measurement Science and Technology, Vol. 20, Issue 4, 2009, p. 045103. [Publisher]
 Case Western Reserve University Bearing Data Center Website, http://csegroups.case.edu/bearingdatacenter/home. [Search CrossRef]
 Smith W. A., Randall R. B. Rolling element bearing diagnostics using the Case Western Reserve University data: A benchmark study. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 64, 2015, p. 100131. [Publisher]
Cited By
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology
Zengkai Liu, Kanglei Lv, Chao Zheng, Baoping Cai, Gang Lei, Yonghong Liu

2022

Journal of Sound and Vibration
Jong Moon Ha, Byeng D. Youn

2022

Measurement
Xiangyu Zhou, Yibing Li, Li Jiang, Li Zhou

2021

Journal of Vibroengineering
Xiang Pan, Mingyue Yu, Guanglei Meng, Wangying Chen

2021

Hongjie Lu, Weiguang Li, Xuezhi Zhao, Hao Wan, Jiale Wu 
2020
