Experimental study on vibration characteristics of fluidsolid coupling cantilever thin aluminum plate
Ma Yinhanga^{1} , Jiang Hanyanga^{2} , Dai Meilingb^{3} , Yang Fujuna^{4}
^{1, 2, 4}Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Engineering Mechanics, Southeast University, Nanjing, 211189, China
^{3}School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China
^{1}Corresponding author
Journal of Vibroengineering, Vol. 22, Issue 5, 2020, p. 10221036.
https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2020.21089
Received 9 October 2019; received in revised form 25 February 2020; accepted 10 March 2020; published 15 August 2020
Compared with the general environment, the modal characteristics of structures under fluidsolid coupling will show great differences. Reasonable experimental methods can provide reliable conclusion support for fluidsolid coupling research. In order to explore the modal characteristics of structures under the action of fluids, the interference and finite element numerical calculation methods are used to study the dry and wet modal characteristics of the cantilever aluminum plate under fluidsolid coupling. According to the amplitude fluctuation resonance discrimination method, the resonant frequency and mode of the cantilever aluminum plate under different working conditions are obtained accurately. Experiments show that the effect of the fluid will greatly reduce the natural frequency of the structure and have little effect on the vibration mode. With the gradual increase of the fluidsolid coupling interface, the natural frequency drop rate and the amplitude at the gasliquid interface remain consistent, and slightly ahead of the amplitude characteristics. At the same time, for each mode with the same characteristics, the frequency decreasing trend is linear, such as the first few pure bending vibration modes, and the first few bending and twisting combined vibration modes contain firstorder twisting vibration. The experimental results and the finite element numerical results are in good agreement, which shows that the electronic speckle method is a good test method for studying fluidsolid coupling modes. Most importantly, the experimental conclusion has reliable reference value for practical engineering applications.
 The experimental method has the advantages of fullfield, noncontact and visualization.
 The amplitude fluctuation resonance discrimination method can quickly obtain the natural frequency of the structure and the modal fringe pattern.
 Experiments have found that the effect of the fluid will greatly reduce the natural frequency of the structure, and the frequency of each order drops between 35% 55%.
 With the gradual increase of the fluidsolid coupling interface, the decline rate of the natural frequency has a correlation with the amplitude at the gasliquid interface.
 The decline rate fluctuates with the fluctuation of the amplitude, and slightly leads the amplitude characteristic.
 For modals with the same characteristics, the frequency decrease trend is linear.
Keywords: electronic speckle pattern interferometry, fluidstructure interaction, vibration mode measurement, experimental investigation, finite element method.
1. Introduction
The modal analysis technology originated in the 1930s and was first applied to the measurement of aircraft modal parameters in the aviation field. After decades of development, especially the maturity of sensor technology, modal analysis has developed rapidly, which has become an important part of the field of vibration engineering [1]. The structure cannot exist independently from the fluid environment. According to the influence of fluid, the modal analysis can be divided into two types: dry modal analysis and wet modal analysis. Dry modal analysis generally ignores the effects of light fluids, and the default structure is calculated in a vacuum environment. The wet mode problem must consider the influence of the additional fluid on the vibration characteristics of the structure. For the small deformation problem, to simplify the calculation, the fluid can be applied to the structure as an additional mass for analysis [2, 3]. The interaction between fluid and structure is a fluidsolid coupling problem [4].
Fluidsolid coupling phenomena are widely found in aerospace, marine, pressure vessels, rail transit, etc. For example, the response of marine pipelines excited by internal and external fluids [5, 6]. Interaction between a highspeed turbine and a highspeed flowing gas or water stream [7, 8]. The attitude of the train running under the action of aerodynamic force [9], etc. Furthermore, the experimental and numerical modal analysis conducted in Ref. [2, 10, 11] suggested that the coupling between the structure and fluid causes the structure to be affected by the fluid in terms of added mass distribution, damping force and elastic restoring force, and thus the vibration characteristics of the structure are changed. Therefore, the fluidsolid coupling vibration problem under the action of fluid is much more complicated than the vibration in the air. In order to reduce the difficulty of analysis, complex engineering problems are usually simplified, the most critical of which is to select key parts of the system and abstract the simplified model for research [12]. The elastic thin plate is one of the most common simplified models, such as turbine blades, water tanks, and thinwalled structures on equipment casings that can be simplified to elastic sheet problems [1319]. For the fluidsolid coupling problem of elastic thin plates, the research mainly focuses on the numerical analysis of dynamic and static problems of coupled systems [15, 2022]. In the study of the description of the deformable plate and fluid interaction, the compatible LagrangianEulerian method can be used. When the solid deformation is small, the problem can be further simplified, but it is insufficient in describing the contact conditions. It is not suitable for cases where the shape of the plate and the flow range vary greatly. For complex problems, the arbitrary LagrangianEulerian method can be used to describe the motion interface continuously and accurately, the method can continuously and accurately track the motion interface and maintain a good unit shape, and it is easy to realize the transformation to Lagrangian coordinates. For fluids and elastomers, it is easy to achieve interface transitions to ensure compatibility and coordination [23]. The experimental modal analysis can take into account the actual factors in engineering practice and obtain real and reliable results. However, the cost of underwater testing is high, and the performance requirements of waterproofing and electrical insulation are proposed for the sensor. Therefore, the underwater vibration test is often difficult to develop due to the limitation of objective conditions. In general engineering, in order to quickly obtain the underwater natural frequency of the structure, it can be obtained by multiplying the natural frequency of the structure in the air by an empirical influence coefficient. Different structures have different empirical coefficients, so the appropriate means to explore the modal measurement of underwater structures has become one of the research hotspots. The experimental methods of modal analysis mainly include the acceleration sensor method, laser Doppler vibration measurement method [13, 16], etc. The former requires a large number of wiring and bonding sensors, the influence of additional quality can’t be ignored. Laser Doppler is limited to pointbypoint measurement, and it must take a lot of time to get the fullfield mode.
The modern photometric method has the advantages of full field, noncontact, high precision, and has been widely used in engineering measurement [2426]. In this paper, the physical model of the cantilever elastic plate under the simplified fluidsolid coupling is established. Electronic speckle interferometry was employed as an experimental measurement method to study the modal characteristics of cantilever aluminum in air and fluid environment. The effects of fluid additional mass, additional damping, pressure and other factors on the vibration mode and natural frequency of the structure, as well as the relationship between the size of the coupling interface and the natural frequency of the structure, are discussed. At the same time, the equivalent finite element model is established by using the wet modal analysis module in the commercial software ANSYS Workbench. The calculated results agree well with the experiment.
2. Experimental procedure
2.1. Electronic speckle interferometry
Electronic speckle interferometry (ESPI) is a noncontact fullfield realtime measurement technology. It has achieved rapid development in recent years due to its versatility, high measurement accuracy, wide frequency range and easy measurement. Electronic speckle interference nondestructive testing technology can perform various tests such as displacement, strain, surface defects and cracks.
Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of an electronic speckle interferometry system for measuring an outofplane modality. In the figure, the laser is expanded by the beam expander to the splitter, and the beam splits into two beams, which are respectively irradiated to the reference plate surface and the sample surface. The two laser beams diffusely reflected by the above surface are again translucent through the beam splitter to the CCD camera target surface to form a speckle pattern. According to the theory of electronic speckle pattern interference derived by Leendertz [27], the speckle intensity recorded by the camera at time $t$ is:
where, ${I}_{o}$ and ${I}_{r}$ re the intensity of the object beam diffusely reflected on the surface of the sample and the reference beam intensity of the diffuse reflection of the reference object, respectively. $\varphi (x,y)$ is the random phase difference between the reference light and the object light when the sample is stationary. $\phi (x,y,t)$ is related to the change of the optical path length caused by the vibration of the sample. For the case of pure offplane vibration, that is, the deformation or displacement of the sample is only along the $z$axis direction shown in Fig. 1, it is known:
where, $A(x,y)\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{s}\left(\omega t\right)$ is the outofplane displacement at the point $(x,y)$ on the object surface at time $t$, $A(x,y)$ represents the amplitude of the measurement point and $\omega $ is the vibration angle frequency. $\lambda $ is the laser wavelength. Since the image acquisition period of the CCD camera is several times longer than the vibration period of the sample, the image displayed by the computer is actually the integral of the light intensity indicated by the Eq. (1) in the imaging period of the CCD, so the measurement method is called Timeaveraged method. That is, the gradation of the digital image output by the CCD is:
where $k$is the CCD photoelectric conversion coefficient and $\tau $is the exposure time. Assuming that the camera exposure time $\tau $ is $N$ times the sample vibration period ($N$ is a positive integer), the above formula can be further written as:
where: ${J}_{0}\left(m\right)$ is the first type of zeroorder Bessel function, $m=4\pi A(x,y)/\lambda $. Eq. (4) shows that the gradation of the image acquired by the CCD varies with the amplitude of the vibration of the sample.
2.2. Time average realtime image subtraction
Since the vibration mode image obtained by the timeaveraging method is affected by the random phase difference (i.e. speckle) and the direct object light and reference light intensity, the actual experimental results cannot be used for modal analysis. Due to the interference of the measurement environment and the disturbance of the airflow, the timeaverage image gradation Eq. (4) collected by the CCD camera at different times includes a random phase difference $\varphi (x,y)$ of the spatial distribution related to the object beam and the reference beam, and There is a timedependent random phase caused by the above factors, at the same time, there is also a timedependent random phase caused by the above factors [28]. Let this timedependent random phase size be $\delta \left(t\right)$, For the case of the Eq. (4), it is equivalent to $\delta \left(t\right)=0$ at this time. For the sake of brevity, when the sample is in a vibrating state, in the two timeaverage images acquired by the CCD camera at different times, the timedependent random phase size of one image is $\delta \left(t\right)$, and the size of the other is 0. Then the realtime subtraction result of the two images can be abbreviated as the following expression [30]:
where $\mathrm{sin}\left[\varphi \left(x,y\right)+\frac{\delta \left(t\right)}{2}\right]$ still represents a random speckle term; $\mathrm{sin}\left[\frac{\delta \left(t\right)}{2}\right]$ modulates the grayscale of the overall image, affects the contrast of the fringes.
Fig. 1. Schematic of out of plane movement detection system
Fig. 2. Variation of grayvalue with vibrating amplitude: a) zeroorder Bessel function, b) firstorder bending fringe pattern of cantilever beam, c) firstorder bending mode of cantilever beam
As shown in Fig. 2(a) is a zeroorder Bessel function, Fig. 2(c) is a firstorder bending mode of the cantilever beam, and Fig. 2(b) is a modal fringe pattern corresponding to the firstorder bending mode of the cantilever beam. It can be seen from Fig. 2 that the image gray value corresponding to the vibration nodal line region is the largest.
2.3. Resonance discrimination by amplitude fluctuation
It can be known from the amplitudefrequency characteristics of the structure that the structure amplitude will increase rapidly when the excitation frequency is close to the natural frequency of the structure, and the structure amplitude will decrease when the excitation frequency is far from the natural frequency of the structure. The degree of density of the fringes obtained only by realtime subtraction makes it difficult to distinguish whether the sample is subjected to forced vibration or modal resonance, which brings certain difficulties in accurately identifying the resonance frequency. Assuming that the excitation frequency is slightly changed, the vibration amplitude fluctuation coefficient of the sample is a. If the influence of the timedependent phase disturbance is neglected, the grayscale of the speckle image collected by the camera before and after the frequency fine adjustment is abbreviated as:
Subtract the above two equations and take the absolute value:
$\mathrm{}\mathrm{}\mathrm{}\mathrm{}\mathrm{}\mathrm{}\approx 4\sqrt{{I}_{O}{I}_{R}}\left{J}_{1}\left[m\left(1+\frac{a}{2}\right)\right]\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{s}\varphi \left(x,y\right)\mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\frac{am}{2}\right.$
It can be seen from the above equation that the speckle gradation obtained by realtime subtraction at the time of amplitude fluctuation is modulated by the firstorder Bessel function ${J}_{1}\left(x\right)$ and the sine function. Eq. (8) shows that when the fluctuation coefficient increases from zero, the period of the firstorder Bessel function quasiperiodic and sinusoidal functions decreases gradually, and the periodic decreasing rate of the sinusoidal function is better than that of the firstorder Bessel function. The period is much faster; when the fluctuation coefficient decreases from zero, the quasiperiod of the firstorder Bessel function will slowly increase, and the period of the sine function will decrease rapidly. Therefore, the two resonant speeds can be used to accurately find the resonant frequency [30].
2.4. Experimental device and experimental model
In order to study the modal characteristics of the thin plate under fluidsolid coupling, a fluidsolid coupling modal experimental system of cantilever aluminum plate as shown in Fig. 3 was built on the isolation platform. The system consists of three parts: electronic speckle interferometric modal measurement optical path, excitation system and fluidsolid coupling device. The test piece is made of aluminum alloy plate with a thickness of 2 mm and is cut into two rectangular plates of 180 mm×40 mm by wire cutting. One end is clamped and fixed by a vise to form a cantilever plate, and placed in a transparent water tank with a 400 mm×600 mm horizontal section. The specimen cantilever size is 150 mm×40 mm×2 mm, the material parameters are elastic modulus $E=$7.1×10^{10 }Pa, Poisson’s ratio $\nu =$0.33, density $\rho =$2.77×10^{3} kg/m^{3}. The test piece is excited by a circular lightweight thin piezoelectric ceramic piece (PZT) attached to the backside. The piezoelectric ceramic piece has a diameter of 15 mm and a thickness of 0.4 mm. The surface of the piezoelectric ceramics and the solder joints are fully waterproofed, and the excitation points are avoided as far as possible from the pitch line position. In the measurement system shown in Fig. 3, the power of 80 lasers produces a green coherent laser with a wavelength of 532 nm; the CCD is a 1280×1024 pixel programmable control camera from IDS, Germany; the signal generator can generate a 025 MHz sine wave made by the RIGOL, China.
In the case of no water, the excitation frequency is slowly adjusted, and the actual resonance frequency is accurately located by the aforementioned amplitude fluctuation resonance discrimination method. Then, Keep the frequency unchanged, the time average realtime image subtraction method is used to obtain natural frequencies and modal fringes of the first 13 orders of the cantilever aluminum plate in air. Then, water was added to the water tank in stages, and the water depth increased by 5 mm each time. The results of 14 sets of working conditions are obtained by the same measurement method. The experimental ambient temperature is 25 degrees Celsius.
Fig. 3. Experimental setup and model
2.5. Acousticsolid coupling finite element method
When the solid structure vibrates and deforms in water, the surrounding water body also moves synchronously. Therefore, the influence of external water on the structure needs to be considered in the structural vibration problem. The coupling of structure and fluid in the vibration process is the fluidsolid coupling problem. The interaction between twophase media is a distinct feature of fluidsolid coupling. Deformed solids can deform or move under fluid loading; deformation or motion, in turn, affects fluid motion, thereby changing the distribution and size of fluid loads. The research methods of fluidsolid coupling mainly include two methods: crossiteration, direct simultaneous solution, and finite element solution. The acousticsolid coupling method used in this paper is one of the finite element methods. For the "wet" mode extraction problem of the structure, the traditional method is to calculate the quality of the attached water as an additional mass point on the propeller model, so that the workload is large, and the weight of each small area of the threedimensional structure needs to be Manually added, while the interaction between water and structure cannot be considered. The commercial software ANSYS Workbench provides an acoustic unit to simulate this type of problem, which can be used to simulate the weight, pressure and adhesion of the surrounding wet surface and attached water. Therefore, this paper chooses the acoustic fluidsolid coupling method to approximate the simulated fluidsolid coupling problem.
The finite element method is one of the most widely used numerical methods for solving fluidstructure interaction problems. The solution is to divide the computational model into finite elements, and then construct a simple field function with only a finite number of parameters to be determined for each unit. The set of field functions can represent the field function of the whole continuum. Finally, a set of algebraic equations with a finite number of parameters to be determined can be established according to the energy equation or the weighted residual equation. The numerical solution of the finite element method is obtained by solving the discrete equations.
When the action of the fluid is not considered, the structural dynamics equation of the discretized structural model with n degrees of freedom can be expressed as:
where ${M}_{s}$ is the mass matrix of the system, ${C}_{s}$ is the damping matrix of the system, ${K}_{s}$ is the stiffness matrix of the system, $\mu $ is the displacement vector of the node, and ${F}_{s}$ is the exciting force of the system.
When the structure is in a static fluid, some assumptions are made about the equation considering the fluidsolid coupling: the fluid is compressible, the pressure fluctuations will cause a change in density; the fluid is nonviscous and nonrotating; the fluid has no motion. Therefore, the fluid will be treated as an acoustic fluid and the governing equations can be expressed by the following acoustic equations:
where $c$ is the velocity of sound propagation in water, $p$ is the pressure of the color fluid caused by sound waves and the force acting on the fluid, $\u2206$ is the Laplacian operator, $\mathrm{k}$ is the fluid volume modulus, and ${\rho}_{0}$ is the average density of the fluid. At the fluidsolid coupling interface, the following equations can be used to describe the interaction of fluids and structures:
where, $n$ is the unit normal vector at the interface and $\nabla p$ is the pressure gradient along the normal vector. Therefore, Eq. (10) can be discretized as:
where ${M}_{f}$ is the fluid equivalent mass matrix, ${C}_{f}$ is the fluid equivalent damping matrix, ${K}_{f}$ is the fluid equivalent stiffness matrix, and ${M}_{sf}$ is the equivalent coupling mass matrix acting on the fluid. Considering the effect of water pressure on the structure at the interface, Eq. (9) is rewritten as:
Therefore, the modal solution equation considering fluidsolid coupling is as follows:
Based on the commercial finite element software ANSYS workbench, the modal characteristics of the cantilever aluminum plate in air and water are numerically calculated. For the modal calculation of the aluminum plate in the air, the influence of the fluid can be neglected, and the dry mode calculation can be directly performed. For the modal calculation of structures in fluids, a threedimensional model of the fluidsolid coupling field equivalent to the experimental one is required. The model consists of two parts, water and cantilever aluminum plate. Since the actual water tank is much larger than the structure, considering the limitation of the calculation amount, the flow field area is set to a rectangular parallelepiped of 120 mm×140 mm×180 mm, The size in both directions of the horizontal plane is more than twice the size of the structure, and the vertical direction is the same as the actual situation, which can be considered to have good equivalence with the experiment. The equivalent model is meshed by the software’s own modeling tool. The structure part adopts a hexahedral mesh, and the fluid adopts a tetrahedral mesh. Among them, the structure is the key point of calculation, the grid needs to be encrypted, the grid size of the cantilever plate is set to 1 mm, and the grid of the fluid area is 5 mm, as shown in Fig. 4 is the fluidsolid coupling finite element model. According to the experimental conditions, the parameters of the finite element model are set: the low end of the cantilever plate is a fixed constraint, the boundary of the fluid domain was show in Fig. 4 the material parameter is aluminum alloy, the fluid model is defined as acoustic fluid, the material is water, the sound velocity is 1.5 km/s, and the gravity acceleration is 9.8 m/s^{2}. The contact surface is defined as the fluidsolid coupling surface, such that the structure is subjected to a force loading due to the fluid pressure along with the fluidstructure interface, and at the same time, the pressure field in the fluid is affected by the motion of the elastic structural boundary.
Fig. 4. Fluidstructure coupled finite element model
3. Experimental results and discussion
The first eleven modes were alternated by pure bending and combined bending and torsion modes which can be compared in both shape and frequency sufficiently, and the two high order torsion modes observed subsequently were used to studied difference in shape of numerical and experimental results, so one gives first 13 order modes of the cantilever aluminum obtained by experiment and simulation based on above consideration. Table 1 shows the first 13 modes of the cantilever aluminum plate in air. The experimental frequency takes the average of two cantilever aluminum plates. The experimental mode and finite element calculation results are basically the same, and the frequency error is less than 2 %, indicating that the electronic speckle test method has good reliability and accuracy. As described in the theory, the fringe pattern is modulated by a zeroorder Bessel function. The brightest line in the figure represents the node line of the mode, and its amplitude is zero. By the position of the node line, the mode shape of the board can be divided into: Pure bending vibration, pure torsional vibration and combined bending and torsional vibration. Due to the small outofplane stiffness of the cantilever thin plate structure and the large lateral stiffness, the first 13 modes are mainly bending vibration and loworder bending and torsion combined vibration modes, among which the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th and 8th, 10th is a pure bending mode, 3rd and 12th are pure torsional vibration modes, and 5th, 7th, 9th, 11th and 13th are combined bending and torsion modes.
Through the underwater test modal analysis, the actual factors in the engineering practice can be considered, and the vibration characteristics of the underwater structure can be obtained. To explore the influence of the size of the acoustic solid contact surface on the vibration characteristics of the structure, the experimental design of different water level heights as a control, slowly graded water into the water tank, each water level increased by 5 mm, each group of experiments recorded the frequency and vibration of the structure according to the aforementioned experimental method. It is found through experiments that when the water is about to reach and has not passed the cantilever plate, the frequency change is very small. Therefore, the experimental group reaches the water level beyond the height of the cantilever plate by 10 mm, and it can be considered that the vibration characteristics tend to be stable. The water levelfrequency curve is obtained by stepwise adding water, and the experimental results corresponding to the first 6 order mode are given in Fig. 5. The short vertical line in the figure is the difference between the adjacent two levels of water depth corresponding to the modal frequency of the cantilever aluminum plate, and the length of the vertical line reflects the speed of the frequency drop. It can be seen from the variation in the figure that the change of the frequency is related to the amplitude of the cantilever plate where the liquid level is located, and the frequency change value increases with the increase of the amplitude, and decreases with the decrease of the amplitude, at the position of the node line, the rate of change of frequency is close to zero. However, this relationship is not an exact correspondence. The frequency change has a certain degree of advancement with respect to the amplitude: the longest vertical line appears before the maximum amplitude point, and the shortest vertical line appears before the node line point. This phenomenon may be caused by additional mass distributed unevenly. Because the structure is a continuum, the additional mass and additional damping of the uneven distribution not only affect the structure of the contact surface, but also affect the structure surface disconnected. It has a greater impact on the structure near the interface, and the effect on the structure far from the interface is gradually reduced. As the modal order increases, the structural radiation area influenced by the additional mass matrix and damping matrix is gradually reduced. For example, in the firstorder bending vibration, the point of the fastest frequency change is 40 mm ahead of the point of maximum amplitude. In the 4th order bending vibration, the corresponding value is 10 mm.
Table 1. The first 13 modes of the cantilever aluminum plate in the air
Ord  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13 
Exp  
Fre/Hz  73.9  455.8  551  1270.6  1689  2496.7  2969.2  4138  4498  6142  6311  7027  7807 
FEM  
Fre/Hz  73.6  460.1  550.58  1290  1705  2532.1  3010.4  4186  4545.7  6215.7  6371.3  6818.5  7486.7 
Err/%  –0.38  0.95  –0.08  1.53  0.95  1.42  1.39  1.16  1.06  1.2  0.96  –2.97  –4.1 
As shown in the red circle area in Fig. 5, when the water level depth exceeds the cantilever plate, the modal frequencies of the various stages tend to be stable, and the frequency remains basically unchanged when the water level continues to rise. At this time, the additional mass and the additional damping are evenly distributed in the whole field position of the structure, and the vibration characteristics of the structure do not change substantially with the increase of the water level, which indicates that the additional mass and additional damping generated by the fluid are the main factors causing the structural vibration characteristics to change, nevertheless, fluid pressure has little effect on structural vibration characteristics. The first 13 order modal results of the cantilever aluminum plate obtained by the experimental method and the acousticsolid coupling finite element method are shown in Table 2, respectively. Compare finite element calculations and experimental results, the modal vibration modes are basically the same, and the frequency difference is mostly within 2 %, This proof that the test method and the finite element model are reliable and accurate. The finite element model does not take into account the additional effects of piezo ceramic exciters, wires, and waterproof materials, which may result in some orders of difference in results exceeding 3 %, such as the 1st and 12th modes.
Fig. 5. Influence of different water levels on the first 6 natural frequencies of cantilever plates
The additional mass and damping obviously affect the natural frequency and response amplitude of the structure. For the same response amplitude, the underwater mode requires a larger excitation voltage. For some modalities, even if the maximum voltage is applied, only a weak response amplitude can be produced, such as the 11th order mode under water. The additional mass and damping have little effect on the loworder vibration modes of the structure. The comparison shows that the first 11 order modes of the air and the underwater are basically the same, while for the higherorder modes, the additional mass and damping have a significant influence on the mode. As shown in Fig. 6, Fig. 6(a) is a comparison of the 12th order modal line in underwater and air. It can be found that there is a slight deviation in the position of the node line. Fig. 6(b) is a comparison of the 13th order mode line in the air and under the water. It can be seen that there is a significant deviation between the two line positions.
Table 2. The first 13 modes of the cantilever aluminum plate in water
Ord  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13 
Exp  
Fre/Hz  31.5  202.7  313.4  597.6  973  1238.2  1740  2148  2701  3363  3875  4559  4918 
FEM  
Fre/Hz  30.5  199.1  306.5  592.0  960.5  1236.9  1729.6  2162.5  2671.9  3381,2  3833.6  4333.7  4767 
Err/%  –3.14  –1.79  –2.21  –0.94  1.28  –0.01  –0.6  0.68  –1.08  0.54  –1.07  –4.9  –3.07 
Fig. 6. Comparison of modal nodal lines in underwater and air: a) 12th order, b) 13th order
a)
b)
Fig. 7 shows the first 13 natural frequencies of the cantilever aluminum plate completely in air and completely in water. It can be seen that the natural frequency of the cantilever aluminum plate measured in water is greatly reduced. The degrees of decline are between 35 % and 55 %. And the frequency decline trend is related to the mode shape: for each mode of the pure bending mode, the frequency change rate is linear, linear fitting of each point can be used to obtain a linear equation: $w=$ 1.3109$n$58.375; For each mode of the combined mode with the firstorder torsion, the frequency change rate shows another linear distribution, and the linear fitting results in $w=$0.5743$n$45.112. At the same time, the frequency drop rate of the pure bending mode is generally lower than that of the combined bending and torsion mode. As the modal order increases, the rate of change of each mode gradually becomes smaller, and the two fitted lines gradually approach. It can be predicted that when it is at a higher mode, the two will tend to intersect.
Fig. 7. Comparison of the first 13th order wet and dry modal frequencies of cantilever plate
In more complex engineering applications, it is often easier to measure the loworder modes of the structure, and it is difficult to measure the higherorder modes. It can be seen from Fig. 7 that for all bending modes, and the combined mode with the firstorder torsion, their frequency changes show good linear characteristics. Therefore, high frequency can be predicted by measuring a small amount of low frequency during the experiment to reduce the workload and measurement difficulty.
4. Conclusions
Based on the electronic speckle interferometry method and the acousticsolid coupling finite element numerical simulation, the dry and wet modal characteristics of the cantilever aluminum plate under fluidsolid coupling are studied. The resonance frequency and modal fringe pattern of the cantilever aluminum plate under different working conditions are obtained accurately by the amplitude fluctuation resonance discrimination method. Since the results are in good agreement with the finite element method, the reliability and accuracy of the experimental model and the finite element model established in this paper can be proved. According to the analysis of the experimental results, the following conclusions can be drawn:
1) The action of the fluid will greatly reduce the natural frequency of the structure, and the frequency of each order drops between 35 % and 55 %. The effect of the fluid on the loworder mode has little effect, but the effect for higherorder mode is more obvious. The main cause of the change in structural vibration characteristics is the additional mass and additional damping produced by the fluid, while the additional pressure has a weak effect on the structural vibration characteristics.
2) With the gradual increase of the fluidsolid coupling interface, the rate of decline of the natural frequency and the amplitude at the gasliquid interface are correlated. The rate of decline fluctuates with fluctuations in amplitude and slightly ahead of the amplitude characteristics. Due to the continuity of the structure, the additional mass and additional damping have a radiating effect on the nonfluid contact area of the structure, and as the order is gradually increased, the effect of the radiation is gradually reduced.
3) For each mode with the same characteristics, the frequency decline trend is linear. For example, the pure bending vibration modes have a linear relationship of frequency reduction rate: $w=$ 1.3109$n$ 58.375; The combined vibration mode with the firstorder torsion has a linear relationship of frequency reduction rate: $w=$ 0.5743$n$45.112.
4) In the actual engineering problems, it is difficult to measure the highorder frequency of the structure. According to the linear relationship of the same type of mode described in the conclusion of Article 3, the fundamental frequency of the structure can be accurately measured to reasonably predict the high frequency of the structure to reduce the test workload.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the financial supports from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11772092, 11472081) and Postgraduate Research and Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (KYCX19_0059).
References
 Ming K. Dry and Wet Model Test Exploration to The Impeller of Nuclear Reactor Coolant Pump. Dalian University of Technology, 2014. [Search CrossRef]
 De La Torre O., Escaler X., Egusquiza E., et al. Numerical and experimental study of a nearby solid boundary and partial submergence effects on hydrofoil added mass. Computers and Fluids, Vol. 91, 2014, p. 19. [Publisher]
 Yadykin Y., Tenetov V., Levin D. The added mass of a flexible plate oscillating in a fluid. Journal of Fluids and Structures, Vol. 17, Issue 1, 2003, p. 115123. [Publisher]
 Haisi G., Ji P., Shouqi Y., et al. Fluidstructure coupling dynamic analysis for the impeller in a mix flow pump. Fluid Machinery, Vol. 46, Issue 1, 2018, p. 4651. [Search CrossRef]
 Neto H. R., Cavalini A., Vedovoto J. M., et al. Influence of seabed proximity on the vibration responses of a pipeline accounting for fluidstructure interaction. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 114, 2019, p. 224238. [Publisher]
 Gao Q., Shengjie Z., Tianbin L., et al. Analysis of Gas Pulsation and Piping Vibration for Reciprocating Compressor on Offshore Drilling and Production Platform. Ship and Ocean Engineering, Vol. 47, Issue 2, 2018, p. 119122. [Search CrossRef]
 Yongchao C., Guoming C., Shumeng Y., et al. Modal analysis on the impeller of disc pump with radial straight blade based on fluidstructure interation. Journal of Mechanical Strength, Vol. 36, Issue 1, 2014, p. 134138. [Search CrossRef]
 Huibin L., Lilin Z., Tiantian S., et al. Modal analysis of turbocharger impeller considering fluidsolid interaction. Journal of Vibration, Measurement and Diagnosis, Vol. 3, 2008, p. 252255. [Search CrossRef]
 Tian L. Approaches and Dynamic Performances of HighSpeed Train FluidStructure. Southwest Jiaotong University, 2012. [Search CrossRef]
 Li H., Ke L., Yang J., et al. Free vibration of variable thickness FGM beam submerged in fluid. Composite Structures, Vol. 233, 2020, p. 111582. [Publisher]
 Faria C. T., Inman D. J. Modeling energy transport in a cantilevered EulerBernoulli beam actively vibrating in Newtonian fluid. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 45, Issue 2, 2014, p. 317329. [Publisher]
 Zhang H., Liu L., Dong M., et al. Analysis of windinduced vibration of fluidstructure interaction system for isolated aqueduct bridge. Engineering Structures, Vol. 46, 2013, p. 2837. [Publisher]
 Shoghmand A., Ahmadian M. T. Dynamics and vibration analysis of an electrostatically actuated FGM microresonator involving flexural and torsional modes. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Vol. 148, 2018, p. 422441. [Publisher]
 Kou H., Lin J., Zhang J., et al. Dynamic and fatigue compressor blade characteristics during fluidstructure interaction: Part IBlade modelling and vibration analysis. Engineering Failure Analysis, Vol. 76, 2017, p. 8098. [Publisher]
 Lee A. H., Campbell R. L., Craven B. A., et al. Fluidstructure interaction simulation of vortexinduced vibration of a flexible hydrofoil. Journal of Vibration and AcousticsTransactions, Vol. 139, Issue 4, 2017, p. 041001. [Publisher]
 Paraz F., Eloy C., Schouveiler L. Experimental study of the response of a flexible plate to a harmonic forcing in a flow. Comptes Rendus Mecanique, Vol. 342, Issue 9, 2014, p. 532538. [Publisher]
 Eskandari M., Samea P., Ahmadi S. F. Axisymmetric timeharmonic response of a surfacestiffened transversely isotropic halfspace. Meccanica, Vol. 52, Issues 12, 2017, p. 183196. [Publisher]
 Ahmadi S. F., Eskandari M. Vibration analysis of a rigid circular disk embedded in a transversely isotropic solid. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 140, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.19437889.0000757. [Publisher]
 Eskandari M., Ahmadi S. F. Green’s functions of a surfacestiffened transversely isotropic halfspace. International Journal of Solids and Structures, Vol. 49, Issues 2324, 2012, p. 32823290. [Publisher]
 Rusinek R., Weremczuk A., Szymanski M., et al. Middle ear vibration with stiff and flexible shape memory prosthesis. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Vol. 150, 2019, p. 2028. [Publisher]
 Nariman N. A. Influence of fluidstructure interaction on vortex induced vibration and lockin phenomena in long span bridges. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, Vol. 10, Issue 4, 2016, p. 363384. [Publisher]
 Ostasevicius V., Dauksevicius R., Gaidys R., et al. Numerical analysis of fluidstructure interaction effects on vibrations of cantilever microstructure. Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 308, Issues 35, 2007, p. 660673. [Publisher]
 Hirt C. W., Amsden A. A., Cook J. L. Arbitrary LagrangianEulerian computing method for all flow speeds. Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 14, Issue 3, 1974, p. 227253. [Publisher]
 Yinhang M., Nan T., Yijun J., et al. Experimental study on nonlinear vibration of cantilever closedcell aluminum foam plates. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), Vol. 47, Issue 4, 2017, p. 732737. [Search CrossRef]
 Xinxing S., Zhenning C., Yuntong D., et al. Research progress of several key problems in digital image correlation method. Journal of Experimental Mechanics, Vol. 32, Issue 3, 2017, p. 305325. [Search CrossRef]
 Yu L., Pan B. Singlecamera highspeed stereodigital image correlation for fullfield vibration measurement. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 94, 2017, p. 374383. [Publisher]
 Leendertz J. A. Interferometric displacement measurement on scattering surfaces utilizing speckle effect. Journal of Physics EScientific Instruments, Vol. 3, Issue 3, 1970, p. 214. [Publisher]
 Moslehi B. Noise power spectra of optical 2beam interferometers induced by the laser phase noise. Journal of Lightwave Technology, Vol. 4, Issue 11, 1986, p. 17041710. [Publisher]
 Ma Y. H., Tao N., Dai M. L., et al. Investigation on Vibration Response of Aluminum Foam Beams Using Speckle Interferometry. Experimental Techniques, 2017. [Publisher]
 Yinhang M., Hanyang J., Meiling D., et al. Cantilevered plate vibration analysis based on electronic speckle pattern interferometry and digital shearing speckle pattern interferometry. Acta Optica Optica Sinica, Vol. 39, Issue 4, 2019, p. 5664. [Publisher]
Cited By
Physics of Fluids
Yueyang Guo, Wenqing Yang, Yuanbo Dong, Jianlin Xuan

2022

Science of Advanced Materials
Li Chen, Meijuan Zhang

2022
